Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28740564›Full record

ArticlePolish journal of radiology2017

Can Diffusion Weighted Imaging Aid in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Sinonasal Masses?: A Useful Adjunct.

Abanti Das, Ashu S Bhalla, Raju Sharma, Atin Kumar, Alok Thakar, Sreenivas M Vishnubhatla, Mehar C Sharma, Suresh C Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abanti DasDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ashu S BhallaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Raju SharmaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Atin KumarDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Alok ThakarDepartment of Otolaryngorhinology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sreenivas M VishnubhatlaDepartment of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Mehar C SharmaDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Suresh C SharmaDepartment of Otolaryngorhinology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the role of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values at 3 Tesla in characterizing sinonasal masses. MATERIAL/

methodsAfter ethical clearance, 79 treatment naive patients with head and neck masses underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including DWI at 3 Tesla using the following b values - 0, 500 and 1000 s/mm

resultsSinonasal masses showed an overlapping growth pattern on conventional imaging, irrespective of their biological nature. The mean ADC value of benign lesions was 1.948±0.459×10

conclusionsDWI in conjunction with conventional imaging can potentially enhance the diagnostic accuracy in characterizing sinonasal masses as benign or malignant. Some specific entities such as JNA and meningioma showed distinctive diffusion characteristics.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance ImagingParanasal Sinus Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID28740564
PMCPMC5499628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.