Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28740524›Full record

ArticleClinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism : the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases

A comparison of two fixation methods for femoral trochanteric fractures: a new generation intramedullary system

Christian Carulli, Federico Piacentini, Tommaso Paoli, Roberto Civinini, Massimo Innocenti

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism : the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Accuracy of radiographic projections to guide cephalic screw position in pertrochanteric fracture: a cadaveric study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian CarulliOrthopaedic Clinic, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Federico PiacentiniOrthopaedic Clinic, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Tommaso PaoliOrthopaedic Clinic, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Roberto CivininiOrthopaedic Clinic, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Massimo InnocentiOrthopaedic Clinic, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
University of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTrochanteric fractures are frequent and generally associated with bone fragility. There is still debate on the best fixation device to treat stable or rather stable trochanteric fractures: we report our clinical and radiological results of fixation with Proximal Femoral Nail "antirotation" (PFNa) in a population of patients compared to a control group treated by Sliding Hip Screw (SHS). MATERIALS AND

methodsA prospective study was conducted in 71 consecutive patients treated by PFNa (group A), and 69 by a SHS (group B), with a mean age of 81.6 and 83.4 years respectively. Short Form 12 was administered to check postoperative results, and the following parameters were evaluated: range of motion, evaluation of pain, gait ability, X-rays, and Tip Apex Distance Index.

resultsA minimum follow-up was conducted in 128 patients: 66 subjects belonging to the PFNa group and 62 to the DHS group. All patients in the group A were able to reach partial or full weight-bearing on the operated leg before leaving the hospital. Forty-four patients (63.8%) of the group B were able to walk with partial weight-bearing before discharge. We recorded 17 complications with a final overall percentage of 17.2% on the overall study population with one single case of failure in both the two groups. DISCUSSION: A statistical significance (p<0.01) of superiority for PFNa was demonstrated regarding surgical time, amplioscope time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, recovery of weight-bearing before discharge. Less significant results (p<0.05) were found for walking ability at the three-months follow-up and patients' satisfaction 6 months after surgery.

conclusionsPFNa may be considered an useful choice for the treatment of stable or rather stable trochanteric fractures as well as DHS. The light superiority of PFNa may be principally related to its mechanical advantages.

Indexed as

cut-outDHSfemurfixationfragility fracturesintramedullary nailPFNasliding hip screwtrochanteric fractures

Identifiers

PMID28740524
PMCPMC5505713
OpenAlexW2735084167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.