Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28740514›Full record

ArticleStem cells international2017

Normal versus Pathological Cardiac Fibroblast-Derived Extracellular Matrix Differentially Modulates Cardiosphere-Derived Cell Paracrine Properties and Commitment.

Francesca Pagano, Francesco Angelini, Clotilde Castaldo, Vittorio Picchio, Elisa Messina, Sebastiano Sciarretta, Ciro Maiello, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, Giacomo Frati, Franca di Meglio and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Emergent materials · 2019
    Article
  18. Cardiac Progenitor Cells: The Matrix Has You.Stem cells translational medicine · 2018
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca PaganoDepartment of Medical Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Francesco AngeliniDepartment of Medical Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Clotilde CastaldoDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Vittorio PicchioDepartment of Medical Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Elisa MessinaDepartment of Pediatrics and Childhood Neuropsychiatry, "Umberto I" Hospital, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1654-9001
Sebastiano SciarrettaDepartment of Medical Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Ciro MaielloDepartment of Cardiothoracic Sciences, Monaldi Hospital, Second University of Naples, Caserta, Italy.
Giuseppe Biondi-ZoccaiDepartment of Medical Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giacomo FratiDepartment of Medical Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2703-3761
Franca di MeglioDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9793-9289
Daria NurzynskaDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1092-6168
Isotta ChimentiDepartment of Medical Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0865-8814
Sapienza University of Rome · ITIstituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human resident cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) isolated as cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs) are under clinical evaluation as a therapeutic product for cardiac regenerative medicine. Unfortunately, limited engraftment and differentiation potential of transplanted cells significantly hamper therapeutic success. Moreover, maladaptive remodelling of the extracellular matrix (ECM) during heart failure progression provides impaired biological and mechanical signals to cardiac cells, including CPCs. In this study, we aimed at investigating the differential effect on the phenotype of human CDCs of cardiac fibroblast-derived ECM substrates from healthy or diseased hearts, named, respectively, normal or pathological cardiogel (CG-N/P). After 7 days of culture, results show increased levels of cardiogenic gene expression (NKX2.5, CX43) on both decellularized cardiogels compared to control, while the proportion and staining patterns of GATA4, OCT4, NKX2.5, ACTA1, VIM, and CD90-positive CPCs were not affected, as assessed by immunofluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry analyses. Nonetheless, CDCs cultured on CG-N secreted significantly higher levels of osteopontin, FGF6, FGF7, NT-3, IGFBP4, and TIMP-2 compared to those cultured on CG-P, suggesting overall a reduced trophic and antiremodelling paracrine profile of CDCs when in contact with ECM from pathological cardiac fibroblasts. These results provide novel insights into the bidirectional interplay between cardiac ECM and CPCs, potentially affecting CPC biology and regenerative potential.

Identifiers

PMID28740514
PMCPMC5504962
OpenAlexW2730906387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.