Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28740434›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2017

A global quantitative survey of hemostatic assessment in postpartum hemorrhage and experience with associated bleeding disorders.

Andra H James, David L Cooper, Michael J Paidas

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04146376 (Von Willebrand Factor in Pregnancy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04146376 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Von Willebrand Factor in Pregnancy (VIP) Study: A Multicenter Study of Wilate Use in Von Willebrand Disease for Childbirth

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2019 to 2026Enrolled110ConditionsVon Willebrand DiseasesArmsUse of a postpartum diary and additional blood draws, VWF replacement therapy with Wilate, Tranexamic acid, Use of a postpartum diary and additional blood draws.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Bleeding resuscitation in the ambulance service, an observational study of standard care in Sweden.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andra H JamesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC.
David L CooperClinical, Medical and Regulatory Affairs, Novo Nordisk Inc., Plainsboro, NJ.
Michael J PaidasDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale Women and Children's Center for Blood Disorders and Preeclampsia Advancement, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Duke University · USNovo Nordisk (United States) · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCoagulopathy may be a serious complicating or contributing factor to postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), and should be promptly recognized to ensure proper bleeding management. This study aims to evaluate the approaches of obstetrician-gynecologists worldwide towards assessing massive PPH caused by underlying bleeding disorders.

methodsA quantitative survey was completed by 302 obstetrician-gynecologists from 6 countries (the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Japan). The survey included questions on the use of hematologic laboratory studies, interpretation of results, laboratory's role in coagulation assessments, and experience with bleeding disorders.

resultsOverall, the most common definitions of "massive" PPH were >2,000 mL (39%) and >1,500 mL (34%) blood loss. The most common criteria for rechecking a "stat" complete blood count and for performing coagulation studies were a drop in blood pressure (73%) and ongoing visible bleeding (78%), respectively. Laboratory coagulation (prothrombin time/activated partial thromboplastin time [PT/aPTT]) and factor VIII/IX assays were performed on-site more often than were mixing studies (laboratory coagulation studies, 93%; factor VIII/IX assays, 63%; mixing studies, 22%). Most commonly consulted sources of additional information were colleagues within one's own specialty (68%) and other specialists (67%). Most respondents had consulted with a hematologist (78%; least, Germany [56%]; greatest, UK [98%]). The most common reason for not consulting was hematologist unavailability (44%). The most commonly reported thresholds for concern with PT and aPTT were 13 to 20 seconds (36%) and 30 to 45 seconds (50%), respectively. Most respondents reported having discovered an underlying bleeding disorder (58%; least, Japan [35%]; greatest, Spain [74%]).

conclusionGlobal survey results highlight similarities and differences between countries in how PPH is assessed and varying levels of obstetrician-gynecologist experience with identification of underlying bleeding disorders and engagement of hematology consultants. Opportunities to improve patient management of PPH associated with bleeding disorders include greater familiarity with interpreting PT/aPTT test results and identification of and consistent consultation with hematologists with relevant expertise.

Indexed as

acquired hemophiliableeding disorderscoagulation studieshematologistpostpartum hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID28740434
PMCPMC5503669
OpenAlexW2727120742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.