ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2017
Conventional real-time PCR-based detection of T790M using tumor tissue or blood in patients with EGFR TKI-resistant NSCLC.
Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The diagnostic accuracy of circulating tumor DNA for the detection of EGFR-T790M mutation in NSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2018Pooled it
- Liquid Biopsy as a Tool for the Characterisation and Early Detection of the Field Cancerization Effect in Patients with Oral Cavity Carcinoma.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- Impact of detecting plasma EGFR mutations with ultrasensitive liquid biopsy in outcomes of NSCLC patients treated with first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2021Observational
- Review
- Cell-Free Circulating Tumour DNA Blood Testing to DetectOntario health technology assessment series · 2020Article
- The diagnostic value of circulating tumor cells and ctDNA for gene mutations in lung cancer.OncoTargets and therapy · 2019Article
- Evidence-based best practices forCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood biopsy has many advantages over tissue biopsy for diagnosing acquired T790M mutation in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, such as being less risky and painful. New techniques with high sensitivity (eg, droplet digital PCR) show promising results during blood biopsy, but the positive rates of identification are still quite unclear. Whether there are other factors, except technology, affecting the results of blood biopsy is unclear. In this study, we used conventional amplification refractory mutation system to detect tumor tissue or blood for T790M mutation in patients clinically resistant to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. A total of 45 patients treated at West China Hospital between 2014 and 2016 were analyzed. The positive rate of T790M mutation was 70.8% based on tissue biopsy and 37.5% based on blood biopsy. Of the 24 patients whose epidermal growth factor receptor gene was genotyped through tissue and blood biopsy, 10 (41.7%) were concordant for T790M mutation status (κ=0.006). Of the 17 patients positive for T790M by tissue biopsy, 7 (41.2%) were positive for T790M by blood biopsy, and 3 of these 7 were only weakly positive. Of the 7 patients negative for T790M by tissue biopsy, 2 (28.6%) were positive by blood biopsy. Our T790M detection rate is higher than that reported by other studies using digital droplet PCR. These results suggest that other factors (eg, clinical features), intrinsically connected with circulating tumor DNA level, also affect the results of blood biopsy, and thus cannot be controlled through technological optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.