Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28740337›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2017

Eubiotic properties of rifaximin: Disruption of the traditional concepts in gut microbiota modulation.

Francesca Romana Ponziani, Maria Assunta Zocco, Francesca D'Aversa, Maurizio Pompili, Antonio Gasbarrini

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04674176 (The Potential Weight Loss Benefits of Rifaximin in an Intermittent Fasting Diet), which is not on this map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04674176 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Potential Weight Loss Benefits of Rifaximin in an Intermittent Fasting Diet

TypeinterventionalSponsorBayhealth Medical CenterRan2021 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsWeight LossArmsRifaximin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Effect of a specificWorld journal of hepatology · 2022
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesca Romana PonzianiFrancesca Romana Ponziani, Maria Assunta Zocco, Francesca D'Aversa, Maurizio Pompili, Antonio Gasbarrini, Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Division, Agostino Gemelli Hospital, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Maria Assunta ZoccoFrancesca Romana Ponziani, Maria Assunta Zocco, Francesca D'Aversa, Maurizio Pompili, Antonio Gasbarrini, Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Division, Agostino Gemelli Hospital, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Francesca D'AversaFrancesca Romana Ponziani, Maria Assunta Zocco, Francesca D'Aversa, Maurizio Pompili, Antonio Gasbarrini, Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Division, Agostino Gemelli Hospital, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Maurizio PompiliFrancesca Romana Ponziani, Maria Assunta Zocco, Francesca D'Aversa, Maurizio Pompili, Antonio Gasbarrini, Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Division, Agostino Gemelli Hospital, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Antonio GasbarriniFrancesca Romana Ponziani, Maria Assunta Zocco, Francesca D'Aversa, Maurizio Pompili, Antonio Gasbarrini, Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Division, Agostino Gemelli Hospital, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotics are usually prescribed to cure infections but they also have significant modulatory effects on the gut microbiota. Several alterations of the intestinal bacterial community have been reported during antibiotic treatment, including the reduction of beneficial bacteria as well as of microbial alpha-diversity. Although after the discontinuation of antibiotic therapies it has been observed a trend towards the restoration of the original condition, the new steady state is different from the previous one, as if antibiotics induced some kind of irreversible perturbation of the gut microbial community. The poorly absorbed antibiotic rifaximin seem to be different from the other antibiotics, because it exerts non-traditional effects additional to the bactericidal/bacteriostatic activity on the gut microbiota. Rifaximin is able to reduce bacterial virulence and translocation, has anti-inflammatory properties and has been demonstrated to positively modulate the gut microbial composition. Animal models, culture studies and metagenomic analyses have demonstrated an increase in

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaCommunicable DiseasesDrug Resistance, BacterialGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansIntestinal MucosaIntestinesPermeabilityRifamycinsRifaximinVirulenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsRifamycinsRifaximinAntibioticDysbiosisEubiosisGut microbiotaGut microbiota modulationIntestinal bacteriaRifaximin

Identifiers

PMID28740337
PMCPMC5504364
OpenAlexW2728880756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.