ArticleJournal of food science and technology2017
Process optimization of spray drying of beetroot Juice.
Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Encapsulation of Phenolic Compounds Extracted from Beet By-Products: Analysis of Physical and Chemical Properties.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Effect of Spray Dryer Scale Size on the Properties of Dried Beetroot Juice.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Optimization of spray drying process parameters for production of Japanese apricot (Food science and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Assessment of factors influencing the concentration of betacyanin fromJournal of food science and technology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to optimize the spray drying process for beetroot juice. Influence of feed flow rate (8, 10 and 11 mL/min), processing temperature (140, 150 and 160 °C) and maltodextrin concentration (20, 25, and 30%) on packed bulk density, moisture content and betalain content of beetroot powder were assessed using response surface methodology. The following optimum process parameters were determined; feed flow rate feed flow rate of 10 mL/min, processing temperature of 149 °C and maltodextrin concentration of 20%. The predicted values for packed bulk density, moisture content and betalain content were 0.62 g/mL, 6.12 and 33.84 mg/100 g of dry matter, respectively. Within the optimum parameters, the experimental values for packed bulk density, moisture content and betalain content were 0.62 ± 0.1 g/mL, 6.10 ± 0.1 and 33.14 ± 0.1 mg/100 gm of dry matter. The similarity of the experimental results to the predicted values verified the models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.