Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28740149›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Specific effect of a dopamine partial agonist on counterfactual learning: evidence from Gilles de la Tourette syndrome.

Alexandre Salvador, Yulia Worbe, Cécile Delorme, Giorgio Coricelli, Raphaël Gaillard, Trevor W Robbins, Andreas Hartmann, Stefano Palminteri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexandre SalvadorLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Paris, France.
Yulia WorbeNational Reference Centre for Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome, Department of Neurology, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Cécile DelormeNational Reference Centre for Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome, Department of Neurology, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Giorgio CoricelliDepartment of Economics, University of Southern California, California, USA.
Raphaël GaillardCentre de Psychiatrie et Neuroscience, Hôpital Sainte Anne, Paris, France.
Trevor W RobbinsDepartment of Psychology and Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Andreas HartmannNational Reference Centre for Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome, Department of Neurology, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Epinière, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Stefano PalminteriLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Paris, France. stefano.palminteri@ens.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-5768-6646
Sorbonne Université · FRCentre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne · FRInstitut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris · FRLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives · FRUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dopamine partial agonist aripiprazole is increasingly used to treat pathologies for which other antipsychotics are indicated because it displays fewer side effects, such as sedation and depression-like symptoms, than other dopamine receptor antagonists. Previously, we showed that aripiprazole may protect motivational function by preserving reinforcement-related signals used to sustain reward-maximization. However, the effect of aripiprazole on more cognitive facets of human reinforcement learning, such as learning from the forgone outcomes of alternative courses of action (i.e., counterfactual learning), is unknown. To test the influence of aripiprazole on counterfactual learning, we administered a reinforcement learning task that involves both direct learning from obtained outcomes and indirect learning from forgone outcomes to two groups of Gilles de la Tourette (GTS) patients, one consisting of patients who were completely unmedicated and the other consisting of patients who were receiving aripiprazole monotherapy, and to healthy subjects. We found that whereas learning performance improved in the presence of counterfactual feedback in both healthy controls and unmedicated GTS patients, this was not the case in aripiprazole-medicated GTS patients. Our results suggest that whereas aripiprazole preserves direct learning of action-outcome associations, it may impair more complex inferential processes, such as counterfactual learning from forgone outcomes, in GTS patients treated with this medication.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyTask Performance and AnalysisAdultAntipsychotic AgentsCase-Control StudiesDopamine AgonistsFemaleHumansLearningMalePsychometricsTourette SyndromeAntipsychotic AgentsDopamine Agonists

Identifiers

PMID28740149
PMCPMC5524760
OpenAlexW2951808504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.