Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28739959›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Young children communicate their ignorance and ask questions.

Paul L Harris, Deborah T Bartz, Meredith L Rowe

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Young children share imagined possibilities: evidence for an early-emerging human competence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The extension of biology through culture.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul L HarrisGraduate School of Education, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 paul_harris@gse.harvard.edu.
Deborah T BartzGraduate School of Education, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Meredith L RoweGraduate School of Education, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.

Funding

Using Language of Higher Order Thinking in Varying EnvironmentsP01HD040605 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GOLDIN-MEADOW, SUSAN J · 2002 to 2018
$19.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD040605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children acquire information, especially about the culture in which they are being raised, by listening to other people. Recent evidence has shown that young children are selective learners who preferentially accept information, especially from informants who are likely to be representative of the surrounding culture. However, the extent to which children understand this process of information transmission and actively exploit it to fill gaps in their knowledge has not been systematically investigated. We review evidence that toddlers exhibit various expressive behaviors when faced with knowledge gaps. They look toward an available adult, convey ignorance via nonverbal gestures (flips/shrugs), and increasingly produce verbal acknowledgments of ignorance ("I don't know"). They also produce comments and questions about what their interlocutors might know and adopt an interrogative stance toward them. Thus, in the second and third years, children actively seek information from interlocutors via nonverbal gestures or verbal questions and display a heightened tendency to encode and retain such sought-after information.

Indexed as

childrencommunicationignorancequestions

Identifiers

PMID28739959
PMCPMC5544273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.