Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28739938›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

The evolution of cognitive mechanisms in response to cultural innovations.

Arnon Lotem, Joseph Y Halpern, Shimon Edelman, Oren Kolodny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evolution of diverse (and advanced) cognitive abilities through adaptive fine-tuning of learning and chunking mechanisms.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Selection shapes diverse animal minds.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Social learning and memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Animal cognition in an urbanised world.Frontiers in ecology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Baldwin effects in early stone tools.Evolutionary anthropology · 2020
    Article
  14. The Development of Cumulative Cultural Learning.Annual review of developmental psychology · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cultural transmission in an ever-changing world: trial-and-error copying may be more robust than precise imitation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  19. The evolution of the capacity for language: the ecological context and adaptive value of a process of cognitive hijacking.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  20. Brain size affects performance in a reversal-learning test.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arnon LotemDepartment of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Joseph Y HalpernDepartment of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850.
Shimon EdelmanDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850.
Oren KolodnyDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 okolodny@stanford.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When humans and other animals make cultural innovations, they also change their environment, thereby imposing new selective pressures that can modify their biological traits. For example, there is evidence that dairy farming by humans favored alleles for adult lactose tolerance. Similarly, the invention of cooking possibly affected the evolution of jaw and tooth morphology. However, when it comes to cognitive traits and learning mechanisms, it is much more difficult to determine whether and how their evolution was affected by culture or by their use in cultural transmission. Here we argue that, excluding very recent cultural innovations, the assumption that culture shaped the evolution of cognition is both more parsimonious and more productive than assuming the opposite. In considering how culture shapes cognition, we suggest that a process-level model of cognitive evolution is necessary and offer such a model. The model employs relatively simple coevolving mechanisms of learning and data acquisition that jointly construct a complex network of a type previously shown to be capable of supporting a range of cognitive abilities. The evolution of cognition, and thus the effect of culture on cognitive evolution, is captured through small modifications of these coevolving learning and data-acquisition mechanisms, whose coordinated action is critical for building an effective network. We use the model to show how these mechanisms are likely to evolve in response to cultural phenomena, such as language and tool-making, which are associated with major changes in data patterns and with new computational and statistical challenges.

Indexed as

cognitive evolutionlanguage evolutionniche constructionsocial learningtool-making

Identifiers

PMID28739938
PMCPMC5544270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.