Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28739918›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Medial temporal lobe and topographical memory.

Zhisen J Urgolites, Ramona O Hopkins, Larry R Squire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Diencephalic integrity explains aspects of hippocampal amnesia.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  2. A Mouse Model of Temporal Lobe Contusion.Journal of neurotrauma · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Perirhinal circuits for memory processing.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. The nature of recollection across months and years and after medial temporal lobe damage.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neurons in Primate Entorhinal Cortex Represent Gaze Position in Multiple Spatial Reference Frames.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhisen J UrgolitesVeterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA 92161.
Ramona O HopkinsDepartment of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84143.
Larry R SquireVeterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA 92161; lsquire@ucsd.edu.

Funding

MEMORY SYSTEMS OF THE MAMMALIAN BRAINR01MH024600 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SQUIRE, LARRY R · 1985 to 2020
$10.0M
TRAINING IN THE NEUROPLASTICITY OF AGINGT32AG000216 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI KOO, EDWARD H. · 1992 to 2017
$8.4M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCET32MH020002 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SEJNOWSKI, TERRENCE J · 1999 to 2020
$6.1M
The Neuropsychology of MemoryI01CX000359 · VA · VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI SQUIRE, LARRY R · 2011 to 2018
–
CSR&D Research Career Scientist AwardIK6CX001644 · VA · VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI SQUIRE, LARRY R · 2018 to 2024
–
CSRD VA I01 CX000359CSRD VA IK6 CX001644NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000216NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH024600NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been interest in the idea that medial temporal lobe (MTL) structures might be especially important for spatial processing and spatial memory. We tested the proposal that the MTL has a specific role in topographical memory as assessed in tasks of scene memory where the viewpoint shifts from study to test. Building on materials used previously for such studies, we administered three different tasks in a total of nine conditions. Participants studied a scene depicting four hills of different shapes and sizes and made a choice among four test images. In the Rotation task, the correct choice depicted the study scene from a shifted perspective. MTL patients succeeded when the study and test images were presented together but failed the moment the study scene was removed (even at a 0-s delay). In the No-Rotation task, the correct choice was a duplicate of the study scene. Patients were impaired to the same extent in the No-Rotation and Rotation tasks after matching for difficulty. Thus, an inability to accommodate changes in viewpoint does not account for patient impairment. In the Nonspatial-Perceptual task, the correct choice depicted the same overall coloring as the study scene. Patients were intact at a 2-s delay but failed at longer, distraction-filled delays. The different results for the spatial and nonspatial tasks are discussed in terms of differences in demand on working memory. We suggest that the difficulty of the spatial tasks rests on the neocortex and on the limitations of working memory, not on the MTL.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermAdultAgedHumansMaleMemory DisordersMiddle AgedTemporal Lobehippocampuslong-term memoryspatial memoryworking memory

Identifiers

PMID28739918
PMCPMC5559052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.