Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28739907›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

A promiscuous split intein with expanded protein engineering applications.

Adam J Stevens, Giridhar Sekar, Neel H Shah, Anahita Z Mostafavi, David Cowburn, Tom W Muir

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adam J StevensDepartment of Chemistry, Frick Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.
Giridhar SekarDepartment of Biochemistry, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461.
Neel H ShahDepartment of Chemistry, Frick Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.
Anahita Z MostafaviDepartment of Chemistry, Frick Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.
David CowburnDepartment of Biochemistry, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461.ORCID 0000-0001-6770-7172
Tom W MuirDepartment of Chemistry, Frick Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544; muir@princeton.edu.
Princeton University · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICST32GM007388 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI CRISTEA, ILEANA M. · 1985 to 2022
$27.4M
Structure, Function and Applications of InteinsR37GM086868 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MUIR, TOM · 2012 to 2021
$5.4M
Development and Applications of 'Designer Chromatin'R01GM107047 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MUIR, TOM · 2013 to 2016
$1.2M
Console and probe upgrade for 600 MHz NMRS10OD016305 · OD · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI COWBURN, DAVID · 2014 to 2014
$595k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107047NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM086868NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007388NIH HHS S10 OD016305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The protein

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsBiotechnologyDNA Polymerase IIIExteinsInteinsModels, MolecularNostocProtein EngineeringProtein SplicingSynechocystisBacterial ProteinsDNA Polymerase IIIchemical biologyintein splicingprotein engineeringprotein semisynthesis

Identifiers

PMID28739907
PMCPMC5559002
OpenAlexW2737841898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.