Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28739655›Full record

GuidelinePediatrics2017

Critical Issues in Food Allergy: A National Academies Consensus Report.

Scott H Sicherer, Katrina Allen, Gideon Lack, Steve L Taylor, Sharon M Donovan, Maria Oria

Open access · greenAbstract readConsensus StatementPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. A virtual management approach to infant egg allergy developed in response to pandemic-imposed restrictions.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Scott H SichererDivision of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; scott.sicherer@mssm.edu.
Katrina AllenCentre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Gideon LackDivision of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, Department of Paediatric Allergy, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Steve L TaylorFood Allergy Research and Resource Program, Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska.
Sharon M DonovanDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois; and.
Maria OriaNational Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, Washington, DC.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USKing's College London · GBNational Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · US

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine convened an expert, ad hoc committee to examine critical issues related to food allergy. The authors of the resulting report, "Finding a Path to Safety in Food Allergy: Assessment of the Global Burden, Causes, Prevention, Management, and Public Policy," evaluated the scientific evidence on the prevalence, diagnosis, prevention, and management of food allergy and made recommendations to bring about a safe environment for those affected. The committee recommended approaches to monitor prevalence, explore risk factors, improve diagnosis, and provide evidence-based health care. Regarding diagnostics, emphasis was placed on utilizing allergy tests judiciously in the context of the medical history because positive test results are not, in isolation, diagnostic. Evidence-based prevention strategies were advised (for example, a strategy to prevent peanut allergy through early dietary introduction). The report encourages improved education of stakeholders for recognizing and managing as well as preventing allergic reactions, including an emphasis on using intramuscular epinephrine promptly to treat anaphylaxis. The report recommends improved food allergen labeling and evaluation of the need for epinephrine autoinjectors with a dosage appropriate for infants. The committee recommended policies and guidelines to prevent and treat food allergic reactions in a various settings and suggested research priorities to address key questions about diagnostics, mechanisms, risk determinants, and management. Identifying safe and effective therapies is the ultimate goal. This article summarizes the key findings from the report and emphasizes recommendations for actions that are applicable to pediatricians and to the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Indexed as

ChildEpinephrineFood HypersensitivityFood LabelingHealth EducationHealth PolicyHumansInfantInjections, IntramuscularPatient Education as TopicPrevalencePrognosisRisk FactorsRisk Reduction BehaviorSympathomimeticsUnited StatesEpinephrineSympathomimetics

Identifiers

PMID28739655
PMCPMC9923536
OpenAlexW2739225905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.