ArticleBMC anesthesiology2017
Assessment of cerebral circulation in a porcine model of intravenously given E. coli induced fulminant sepsis.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Left ventricle chest compression improves ETCOResuscitation plus · 2022Article
- Clinical improvement of sepsis by extracorporeal centrifugal leukocyte apheresis in a porcine model.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Cerebral Autoregulation-Guided Optimal Blood Pressure in Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy: A Case Series.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2020Article
- Hemodynamic consequences of intravenously given E. coli suspension: observations in a fulminant sepsis model in pigs, a descriptive case-control study.European journal of medical research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of the present work was to assess cerebral hemodynamic changes in a porcine model of E.coli induced fulminant sepsis.
methodsNineteen healthy female Hungahib pigs, 10-12 weeks old, randomly assigned into two groups: Control (n = 9) or Septic Group (n = 10). In the Sepsis group Escherichia coli culture suspended in physiological saline was intravenously administrated in a continuously increasing manner according to the following protocol: 2 ml of bacterial culture suspended in physiological saline was injected in the first 30 min, then 4 ml of bacterial culture was administered within 30 min, followed by infusion of 32 ml bacterial culture for 2 h. Control animals received identical amount of saline infusion. Systemic hemodynamic parameters were assessed by PiCCo monitoring, and cerebral hemodynamics by transcranial Doppler sonography (transorbital approach) in both groups.
resultsIn control animals, systemic hemodynamic variables and cerebral blood flow velocities and pulsatility indices were relatively stable during the entire procedure. In septic animals shock developed in 165 (IQR: 60-255) minutes after starting the injection of E.coli solution. Blood pressure values gradully decreased, whereas pulse rate increased. A decrease in cardiac index, an increased systemic vascular resistance, and an increased stroke volume variation were observed. Mean cerebral blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery did not change during the procedure, but pulsatility index significantly increased.
conclusionsThere is vasoconstriction at the level of the cerebral arterioles in the early phase of experimental sepsis that overwhelmes autoregulatory response. These results may serve as additional pathophysiological information on the cerebral hemodynamic changes occurring during the septic process and may contribute to a better understanding of the pathomechanism of septic encephalopathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.