Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28738830›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2017

Resampling-based tests for Lasso in genome-wide association studies.

Jaron Arbet, Matt McGue, Snigdhansu Chatterjee, Saonli Basu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jaron ArbetDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455, USA.
Matt McGueDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455, USA.
Snigdhansu ChatterjeeDepartment of Statistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455, USA.
Saonli BasuDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455, USA. saonli@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1200-4546

Funding

TWIN STUDY OF FEMALE ALCOHOLISMS AND OTHER DISORDERSR01AA009367 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI MCGUE, MATTHEW K. · 1992 to 2013
$9.0M
Twin Family Study of Vulnerability to Substance AbuseR37DA005147 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI IACONO, WILLIAM G. · 2009 to 2018
$6.4M
A Longitudinal Study of Adopted Youth and Their FamiliesR01MH066140 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI MCGUE, MATTHEW K. · 2003 to 2013
$5.8M
TWIN/FAMILY STUDY OF VULNERABILITY TO SUBSTANCE ABUSER01DA005147 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI IACONO, WILLIAM G · 1987 to 2007
$5.5M
Adolescent drinking and midlife outcomes: A prospective cotwin control studyR37AA009367 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MCGUE, MATTHEW K. · 2016 to 2024
$5.4M
TWIN STUDY OF ADHD, CD, AND SUBSTANCE ABUSER01DA013240 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI IACONO, WILLIAM G. · 2000 to 2010
$5.0M
SIBLING MODELS OF ADOLESCENT ALCOHOL USE AND ABUSER01AA011886 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI MCGUE, MATTHEW K. · 1998 to 2008
$2.5M
Statistical Methods for detection of genome-wide GxE interactions in longitudinalR01DA033958 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BASU, SAONLI · 2013 to 2016
$1.1M
Biostatistics in Genetics and Genomics Training ProgramT32GM108557 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI · 2014 to 2018
$583k
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA009367NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA011886NIAAA NIH HHS R37 AA009367NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA005147NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013240NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033958NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA005147NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM108557NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH066140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenome-wide association studies involve detecting association between millions of genetic variants and a trait, which typically use univariate regression to test association between each single variant and the phenotype. Alternatively, Lasso penalized regression allows one to jointly model the relationship between all genetic variants and the phenotype. However, it is unclear how to best conduct inference on the individual Lasso coefficients, especially in high-dimensional settings.

methodsWe consider six methods for testing the Lasso coefficients: two permutation (Lasso-Ayers, Lasso-PL) and one analytic approach (Lasso-AL) to select the penalty parameter for type-1-error control, residual bootstrap (Lasso-RB), modified residual bootstrap (Lasso-MRB), and a permutation test (Lasso-PT). Methods are compared via simulations and application to the Minnesota Center for Twins and Family Study.

resultsWe show that for finite sample sizes with increasing number of null predictors, Lasso-RB, Lasso-MRB, and Lasso-PT fail to be viable methods of inference. However, Lasso-PL and Lasso-AL remain fast and powerful tools for conducting inference with the Lasso, even in high-dimensions.

conclusionOur results suggest that the proposed permutation selection procedure (Lasso-PL) and the analytic selection method (Lasso-AL) are fast and powerful alternatives to the standard univariate analysis in genome-wide association studies.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGenome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociBayes TheoremComputer SimulationGenetic MarkersHumansPhenotypeSampling StudiesTwin Studies as TopicGenetic MarkersBootstrapGWASLassoPermutationResamplingTesting

Identifiers

PMID28738830
PMCPMC5525347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.