Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28738759›Full record

ArticleThe journal of spinal cord medicine2017

Views of individuals with spinal cord injury on the use of wearable cameras to monitor upper limb function in the home and community.

Jirapat Likitlersuang, Elizabeth R Sumitro, Pirashanth Theventhiran, Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan, José Zariffa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Personalized Approaches to Spine Surgery.International journal of spine surgery · 2024
    Article
  3. Depth over RGB: automatic evaluation of open surgery skills using depth camera.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Identifying Hand Use and Hand Roles After Stroke Using Egocentric Video.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jirapat Likitlersuanga Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network , Toronto , Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9713-4587
Elizabeth R Sumitroa Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network , Toronto , Canada.
Pirashanth Theventhirana Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network , Toronto , Canada.
Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryana Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network , Toronto , Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2332-5986
José Zariffaa Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network , Toronto , Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8842-745X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHand function impairment after cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) can significantly reduce independence. Unlike current hand function assessments, wearable camera systems could potentially measure functional hand usage at home, and thus benefit the development of neurorehabilitation strategies. The objective of this study was to understand the views of individuals with SCI on the use of wearable cameras to track neurorehabilitation progress and outcomes in the community.

designQuestionnaires.

settingHome simulation laboratory.

participantsFifteen individuals with cervical SCI. OUTCOME MEASURES: After using wearable cameras in the simulated home environment, participants completed custom questionnaires, comprising open-ended and structured questions.

resultsParticipants showed relatively low concerns related to data confidentiality when first-person videos are used by clinicians (1.93 ± 1.28 on a 5-point Likert scale) or researchers (2.00 ± 1.31). Storing only automatically extracted metrics reduced privacy concerns. Though participants reported moderate privacy concerns (2.53 ± 1.51) about wearing a camera in daily life due to certain sensitive situations (e.g. washrooms), they felt that information about their hand usage at home is useful for researchers (4.73 ± 0.59), clinicians (4.47 ± 0.83), and themselves (4.40 ± 0.83). Participants found the system moderately comfortable (3.27 ± 1.44), but expressed low desire to use it frequently (2.87 ± 1.36).

conclusionDespite some privacy and comfort concerns, participants believed that the information obtained would be useful. With appropriate strategies to minimize the data stored and recording duration, wearable cameras can be a well-accepted tool to track function in the home and community after SCI.

Indexed as

AttitudeMovementActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedCervical VertebraeFemaleHandHumansIndependent LivingMaleMiddle AgedNeurological RehabilitationSpinal Cord InjuriesTelerehabilitationVideo RecordingCommunity-based functional assessmentEgocentric camerasOutcome measuresPrivacySpinal cord injurySurveys and questionnairesUpper limbWearable technology

Identifiers

PMID28738759
PMCPMC5778934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.