Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28738740›Full record

SynthesisThe journal of spinal cord medicine2018

A systematic review of the effectiveness of task-specific rehabilitation interventions for improving independent sitting and standing function in spinal cord injury.

Cynthia M Tse, Amanda E Chisholm, Tania Lam, Janice J Eng, SCIRE Research Team

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cynthia M Tsea School of Kinesiology , University of British Columbia , Vancouver , BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8363-5869
Amanda E Chisholma School of Kinesiology , University of British Columbia , Vancouver , BC, Canada.
Tania Lama School of Kinesiology , University of British Columbia , Vancouver , BC, Canada.
Janice J Engb International Collaboration On Repair Discoveries , Vancouver Costal Health Research Institute , Vancouver , BC , Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2093-0788
SCIRE Research Team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextImpaired balance function after a spinal cord injury (SCI) hinders performance of daily activities.

objectiveTo assess the evidence on the effectiveness of task-specific training on sitting and standing function in individuals with SCI across the continuum of care.

methodsA systematic search was conducted on literature published to June 2016 using people (acute or chronic SCI), task-specific interventions compared to conventional physical therapy, and outcome (sitting or standing balance function). The PEDro scale was used to investigate the susceptibility to bias and trial quality of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A standardized mean difference (SMD) was conducted to investigate the effect size for interventions with sitting or standing balance outcomes.

resultsNineteen articles were identified; three RCTs, two prospective controlled trials, one cross-over study, nine pre-post studies and four prospective cohort studies. RCT and cross-over studies were rated from 6 to 8 indicating good quality on the PEDro scale. The SMD of task-specific interventions in sitting compared to active and inactive (no training) control groups was -0.09 (95% CI: -0.663 to 0.488) and 0.39 (95% CI: -0.165 to 0.937) respectively, indicating that the addition of task-specific exercises did not affect sit and reach test performance significantly. Similarly, the addition of BWS training did not significantly affect BBS compared to conventional physical therapy -0.36 (95% CI: -0.840 to 0.113). Task-specific interventions reported in uncontrolled trials revealed positive effects on sitting and standing balance function.

conclusionFew RCT studies provided balance outcomes, and those that were evaluated indicate negligible effect sizes. Given the importance of balance control underpinning all aspects of daily activities, there is a need for further research to evaluate specific features of training interventions to improve both sitting and standing balance function in SCI.

Indexed as

Postural BalanceAdultClinical Trials as TopicExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurological RehabilitationSitting PositionSpinal Cord InjuriesStanding PositionGaitPostural balanceRehabilitationReviewSpinal cord injuries

Identifiers

PMID28738740
PMCPMC6055957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.