Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28738126›Full record

ArticleJAMA neurology2017

Comparing Plasma Phospho Tau, Total Tau, and Phospho Tau-Total Tau Ratio as Acute and Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury Biomarkers.

Richard Rubenstein, Binggong Chang, John K Yue, Allen Chiu, Ethan A Winkler, Ava M Puccio, Ramon Diaz-Arrastia, Esther L Yuh, Pratik Mukherjee, Alex B Valadka and 19 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 148 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 266 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Research progress on biomarkers of traumatic brain injury.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Richard RubensteinLaboratory of Neurodegenerative Diseases and CNS Biomarker Discovery, Departments of Neurology and Physiology/Pharmacology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn.
Binggong ChangLaboratory of Neurodegenerative Diseases and CNS Biomarker Discovery, Departments of Neurology and Physiology/Pharmacology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn.
John K YueBrain and Spinal Injury Center, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California.
Allen ChiuLaboratory of Neurodegenerative Diseases and CNS Biomarker Discovery, Departments of Neurology and Physiology/Pharmacology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn.
Ethan A WinklerBrain and Spinal Injury Center, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California.
Ava M PuccioDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Ramon Diaz-ArrastiaUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Esther L YuhBrain and Spinal Injury Center, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California.
Pratik MukherjeeBrain and Spinal Injury Center, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California.
Alex B ValadkaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
Wayne A GordonDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
David O OkonkwoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Peter DaviesLitwin-Zucker Center for Research in Alzheimer's Disease, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York.
Sanjeev AgarwalDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn.
Fan LinProgram for Neurotrauma, Neuroproteomics, and Biomarker Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Psychiatry and Chemistry, University of Florida, Gainesville.
George SarkisProgram for Neurotrauma, Neuroproteomics, and Biomarker Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Psychiatry and Chemistry, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Hamad YadikarProgram for Neurotrauma, Neuroproteomics, and Biomarker Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Psychiatry and Chemistry, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Zhihui YangProgram for Neurotrauma, Neuroproteomics, and Biomarker Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Psychiatry and Chemistry, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Geoffrey T ManleyBrain and Spinal Injury Center, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California.
Kevin K W WangProgram for Neurotrauma, Neuroproteomics, and Biomarker Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Psychiatry and Chemistry, University of Florida, Gainesville.
the TRACK-TBI Investigators
Shelly R CooperDepartment of Psychology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri.
Kristen Dams-O'ConnorDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Allison J BorrassoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Tomoo InoueBrain and Spinal Injury Center, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California.
Andrew I R MaasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
David K MenonDepartments of Anesthesia and Neurocritical Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
David M SchnyerDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin.
Mary J VassarBrain and Spinal Injury Center, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California.
San Francisco General Hospital · USUniversity of Florida · USState University of New York · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USUniversity of Cambridge · GBWashington University in St. Louis · USFeinstein Institute for Medical Research · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain InjuryU01NS086090 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DIAZ-ARRASTIA, RAMON, GIACINO, JOSEPH THOMAS · 2013 to 2017
$19.1M
Transforming Traumatic Brain Injury Research and Clinical CareRC2NS069409 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MANLEY, GEOFFREY T · 2009 to 2011
$4.3M
A Mouse Model of Tau Pathology in AD and Other DementiasR01AG022102 · NIA · FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI DAVIES, PETER P · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
Repetitive mTBI-induced neurobehavioral changes and CTE-like proteinopathyI01RX001859 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI WANG, KEVIN KA WANG · 2016 to 2020
–
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG022102NINDS NIH HHS RC2 NS069409NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS086090RRD VA I01 RX001859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Annually in the United States, at least 3.5 million people seek medical attention for traumatic brain injury (TBI). The development of therapies for TBI is limited by the absence of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Microtubule-associated protein tau is an axonal phosphoprotein. To date, the presence of the hypophosphorylated tau protein (P-tau) in plasma from patients with acute TBI and chronic TBI has not been investigated. Objective: To examine the associations between plasma P-tau and total-tau (T-tau) levels and injury presence, severity, type of pathoanatomic lesion (neuroimaging), and patient outcomes in acute and chronic TBI. Design, Setting, and Participants: In the TRACK-TBI Pilot study, plasma was collected at a single time point from 196 patients with acute TBI admitted to 3 level I trauma centers (<24 hours after injury) and 21 patients with TBI admitted to inpatient rehabilitation units (mean [SD], 176.4 [44.5] days after injury). Control samples were purchased from a commercial vendor. The TRACK-TBI Pilot study was conducted from April 1, 2010, to June 30, 2012. Data analysis for the current investigation was performed from August 1, 2015, to March 13, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Plasma samples were assayed for P-tau (using an antibody that specifically recognizes phosphothreonine-231) and T-tau using ultra-high sensitivity laser-based immunoassay multi-arrayed fiberoptics conjugated with rolling circle amplification. Results: In the 217 patients with TBI, 161 (74.2%) were men; mean (SD) age was 42.5 (18.1) years. The P-tau and T-tau levels and P-tau-T-tau ratio in patients with acute TBI were higher than those in healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristic analysis for the 3 tau indices demonstrated accuracy with area under the curve (AUC) of 1.000, 0.916, and 1.000, respectively, for discriminating mild TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score, 13-15, n = 162) from healthy controls. The P-tau level and P-tau-T-tau ratio were higher in individuals with more severe TBI (GCS, ≤12 vs 13-15). The P-tau level and P-tau-T-tau ratio outperformed the T-tau level in distinguishing cranial computed tomography-positive from -negative cases (AUC = 0.921, 0.923, and 0.646, respectively). Acute P-tau levels and P-tau-T-tau ratio weakly distinguished patients with TBI who had good outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended GOS-E, 7-8) (AUC = 0.663 and 0.658, respectively) and identified those with poor outcomes (GOS-E, ≤4 vs >4) (AUC = 0.771 and 0.777, respectively). Plasma samples from patients with chronic TBI also showed elevated P-tau levels and a P-tau-T-tau ratio significantly higher than that of healthy controls, with both P-tau indices strongly discriminating patients with chronic TBI from healthy controls (AUC = 1.000 and 0.963, respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: Plasma P-tau levels and P-tau-T-tau ratio outperformed T-tau level as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for acute TBI. Compared with T-tau levels alone, P-tau levels and P-tau-T-tau ratios show more robust and sustained elevations among patients with chronic TBI.

Indexed as

Glasgow Coma ScaleGlasgow Outcome ScaleAcute DiseaseAdultBiomarkersBrain Injuries, TraumaticChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective Studiestau ProteinsTrauma CentersYoung AdultBiomarkerstau Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28738126
PMCPMC5710183
OpenAlexW2738010656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.