Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28738066›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Expansion by whole genome duplication and evolution of the sox gene family in teleost fish.

Emilien Voldoire, Frédéric Brunet, Magali Naville, Jean-Nicolas Volff, Delphine Galiana

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Genome wide identification, phylogeny, and synteny analysis ofBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emilien VoldoireInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon1, CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Frédéric BrunetInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon1, CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Magali NavilleInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon1, CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Jean-Nicolas VolffInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon1, CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Delphine GalianaInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon1, CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6699-6013
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is now recognized that several rounds of whole genome duplication (WGD) have occurred during the evolution of vertebrates, but the link between WGDs and phenotypic diversification remains unsolved. We have investigated in this study the impact of the teleost-specific WGD on the evolution of the sox gene family in teleostean fishes. The sox gene family, which encodes for transcription factors, has essential role in morphology, physiology and behavior of vertebrates and teleosts, the current largest group of vertebrates. We have first redrawn the evolution of all sox genes identified in eleven teleost genomes using a comparative genomic approach including phylogenetic and synteny analyses. We noticed, compared to tetrapods, an important expansion of the sox family: 58% (11/19) of sox genes are duplicated in teleost genomes. Furthermore, all duplicated sox genes, except sox17 paralogs, are derived from the teleost-specific WGD. Then, focusing on five sox genes, analyzing the evolution of coding and non-coding sequences, as well as the expression patterns in fish embryos and adult tissues, we demonstrated that these paralogs followed lineage-specific evolutionary trajectories in teleost genomes. This work, based on whole genome data from multiple teleostean species, supports the contribution of WGDs to the expansion of gene families, as well as to the emergence of genomic differences between lineages that might promote genetic and phenotypic diversity in teleosts.

Indexed as

AnimalsEvolution, MolecularFishesGene DuplicationGenes, DuplicateGenomeGenomicsPhylogenySequence Alignment

Identifiers

PMID28738066
PMCPMC5524304
OpenAlexW2737631629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.