Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28738057›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

The fatty liver index as a predictor of incident chronic kidney disease in a 10-year prospective cohort study.

Ji Hye Huh, Jang Young Kim, Eunhee Choi, Jae Seok Kim, Yoosoo Chang, Ki-Chul Sung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Fatty liver index (FLI): more than a marker of hepatic steatosis.Journal of physiology and biochemistry · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ji Hye HuhDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
Jang Young KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0813-7082
Eunhee ChoiBiostatistician, Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States of America.
Jae Seok KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
Yoosoo ChangDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ki-Chul SungDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yonsei University · KRBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USKangbuk Samsung Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is considered to be associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD), long-term follow up data is lacking. We investigated whether NAFLD, as determined by the fatty liver index (FLI), could predict incident CKD in 10-year prospective cohort study. We also assessed the clinical utility of FLI to predict the development of CKD.

methods6,238 adults aged 40 to 69 years without baseline CKD from the Ansan-Ansung cohort were examined. Patients were classified according to FLI as follows: FLI<30, no NAFLD; FLI≥60, NAFLD; and 30≤ FLI<60, intermediate. Incident CKD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. The clinical utility of FLI in predicting incident CKD was estimated via area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) analyses.

resultsDuring an average of 10 years of follow-up, 724 subjects (15.21%) developed CKD. The adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] for incident CKD increased in a graded manner with FLI increased (<30 vs. 30-59 vs. ≥60 = 1 vs. 1.17 [0.997-1.375] vs. 1.459 [1.189-1.791], respectively, P for trend = 0.0012). Incorporation of FLI into traditional risk factors of CKD significantly increased prediction of incident CKD based on NRI (17%; 95% CI, 8.9-25%; P-value <0.001) and IDI (0.002; 95% CI, 0.0046-0.0143; P-value = 0.046).

conclusionsFLI, a surrogate marker of NAFLD, was an independent risk factor for incident CKD. FLI provides meaningful incremental risk reclassification beyond that of conventional risk factors of CKD.

Indexed as

BiomarkersFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRisk FactorsROC CurveBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID28738057
PMCPMC5524328
OpenAlexW2737934310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.