Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28737996›Full record

ArticleJournal of palliative medicine2017

Integrating Palliative and Oncology Care for Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Quality Improvement Intervention.

Laura C Hanson, Frances Collichio, Stephen A Bernard, William A Wood, Matt Milowsky, Erin Burgess, Crista J Creedle, Summer Cheek, Lydia Chang, Bhisham Chera and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of palliative medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Factors associated with avoidable 30-day readmissions in patients with cancer: a single institution study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Goals of care discussions: perceptions of radiation and medical oncologists.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  8. A hybrid model of acute unscheduled cancer care provided by a hospital-based acute care clinic and the emergency department: a descriptive study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  9. Revue des maladies respiratoires actualites · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Laura C Hanson1 Division of Geriatric Medicine, The University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Frances Collichio4 Division of Hematology and Oncology, The University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Stephen A Bernard2 Palliative Care Program, The University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
William A Wood4 Division of Hematology and Oncology, The University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Matt Milowsky4 Division of Hematology and Oncology, The University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Erin Burgess5 Performance Improvement & Patient Safety, UNC Hospitals , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Crista J Creedle6 Hematology Oncology Nursing, UNC Hospitals , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Summer Cheek6 Hematology Oncology Nursing, UNC Hospitals , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Lydia Chang7 Division of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, The University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Bhisham Chera8 Patient Safety and Quality, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Alexandra Fox3 Cecil Sheps Center for Health Services Research, The University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Feng-Chang Lin9 Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, The University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SUSAN M. SMITH · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPractice guidelines recommend palliative care for patients with advanced cancer, but gaps in access and quality of care persist.

objectiveTo increase goals-of-care (GOC) communication for hospitalized patients with Stage IV cancer.

methodsAn interdisciplinary team designed a quality improvement intervention to enhance oncology palliative care, including training in communication skills and triggers for palliative care consults. SETTING/SUBJECTS: All adult inpatients with Stage IV cancer and unplanned admission at an 804-bed hospital affiliated with a National Cancer Institute (NCI) Comprehensive Cancer Center. MEASUREMENTS: The primary quality measure was the percentage of patients with Stage IV cancer who had a GOC discussion during hospitalization; secondary measures included screening for pain, dyspnea, spiritual needs, and outcomes of intensive care, hospice, and 30-day readmission.

resultsIn the 11-month study period, n = 330, Stage IV cancer patients were hospitalized. Comparing the first three months with the final three months, rates of GOC discussion increased from 29% to 48% (p = 0.013), and specialty palliative care consultation increased from 18% to 33%, (p = 0.026). Rates of symptom screening, intensive care unit transfer, hospice, and 30-day re-admission did not change overall. However, patients with specialty palliative care more frequently had pain screening (91% vs. 81%, p = 0.020), spiritual assessment (48% vs. 10%, p < 0.001), and hospice referral (39% vs. 9%, p < 0.001), and they were less likely to be re-admitted within 30 days (12% vs. 21%, p = 0.059). DISCUSSION: Interdisciplinary quality improvement was effective to increase GOC discussions and palliative care consults for patients with Stage IV cancer.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCommunicationFemaleHospice CareHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPalliative CarePatient Care PlanningProfessional-Patient RelationsQuality Improvementadvanced cancerpalliative carequality improvement

Identifiers

PMID28737996
PMCPMC5749575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.