Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28737759›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2018

Outcome of universal newborn eye screening with wide-field digital retinal image acquisition system: a pilot study.

P Goyal, T R Padhi, T Das, L Pradhan, S Sutar, S Butola, U C Behera, L Jain, S Jalali

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Incidence and distribution of ocular disorders in the first year of life.Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Imaging the pediatric retina: An overview.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Retinal Telemedicine.Current ophthalmology reports · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P GoyalRetina and Vitreous services, Shri Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
T R PadhiRetina and Vitreous services, Shri Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
T DasSmt. Kanuri Santhamma Center for Vitreoretinal Services, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
L PradhanInfosys Pediatric Center, Capital Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India.
S SutarRetina and Vitreous services, Shri Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
S ButolaRetina and Vitreous services, Shri Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
U C BeheraRetina and Vitreous services, Shri Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
L JainRetina and Vitreous services, Shri Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
S JalaliSmt. Kanuri Santhamma Center for Vitreoretinal Services, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
L V Prasad Eye Institute · INInfosys (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the outcome of universal newborn eye screening with wide-field digital retinal imaging (WFDRI) system.MethodsIn this pilot study, we examined 1152 apparently healthy newborn infants in the obstetrics and gynecology ward of a civil hospital in Eastern India over 1.5 years. The examination included external eye examination, red reflex test and fundus imaging by WFDRI (RetCam II, Clarity medical system, Pleasanton, CA, USA) by a trained optometrist. The pathologies detected, net monetary gain and skilled manpower saved were documented. The results were compared with three similar studies thus far published in the literature.ResultsOcular abnormality of any kind was seen in 172 (14.93%) babies. Retinal hemorrhage in 153 babies (88.9% of all abnormal findings) was the most common abnormality; it was bilateral in 118 (77.12%) babies and 4 babies had foveal hemorrhage. Other abnormalities included vitreous hemorrhage (n=1), congenital glaucoma (n=2), uveal coloboma (n=2), retinopathy mimicking retinopathy of prematurity (n=2), and cystic fovea (n=3). The retinal hemorrhages resolved spontaneously in all eyes. One baby with congenital glaucoma received surgery and the other was treated medically. The benefits included savings in skilled manpower, a net monetary gain of INR 4.195 million (US$ 62,612) and skilled manpower saving by 319.4 h.ConclusionsThe universal neonatal eye screening using WFDRI detected pathologies that needed immediate care or regular follow up; saved skilled manpower with a net monetary gain. But compared to a red reflex test the benefits were marginal in terms of detecting treatment warranting ocular pathologies.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureFemaleHumansIncidenceIndiaInfant, NewbornMaleNeonatal ScreeningOphthalmoscopyPilot ProjectsRetinaRetinopathy of PrematurityRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID28737759
PMCPMC5770699
OpenAlexW2738278129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.