SynthesisInternational wound journal2017
Comparing the reported burn conditions for different severity burns in porcine models: a systematic review.
Synthesis in International wound journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Epidemiological characteristics and the establishment and evaluation of a risk prediction model for nosocomial infection in burn patients].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2022Trial
- Experimental Burn Induction in Laboratory Animals: A Scoping Review of Methods, Reproducibility, Operator-Dependent Variability, and Relevance to Soft Tissue Reconstruction and Repair.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparative Evaluation of Immersion and Spillover Scald Burns in Pediatric Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2025Article
- Comparing collagenase and silver sulfadiazine in deep second-degree burn treatment.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Article
- Deep neural network classification of in vivo burn injuries with different etiologies using terahertz time-domain spectral imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Development of a reproducible porcine model of infected burn wounds.Journal of biological methods · 2022Article
- Comparison of comparable scald and contact burns in a porcine model: A preliminary report.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2020Article
- Standards in Biologic Lesions: Cutaneous Thermal Injury and Inhalation Injury Working Group 2018 Meeting Proceedings.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2020Article
- Epidemiological analysis of 9,779 burn patients in China: An eight-year retrospective study at a major burn center in southwest China.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are many porcine burn models that create burns using different materials (e.g. metal, water) and different burn conditions (e.g. temperature and duration of exposure). This review aims to determine whether a pooled analysis of these studies can provide insight into the burn materials and conditions required to create burns of a specific severity. A systematic review of 42 porcine burn studies describing the depth of burn injury with histological evaluation is presented. Inclusion criteria included thermal burns, burns created with a novel method or material, histological evaluation within 7 days post-burn and method for depth of injury assessment specified. Conditions causing deep dermal scald burns compared to contact burns of equivalent severity were disparate, with lower temperatures and shorter durations reported for scald burns (83°C for 14 seconds) compared to contact burns (111°C for 23 seconds). A valuable archive of the different mechanisms and materials used for porcine burn models is presented to aid design and optimisation of future models. Significantly, this review demonstrates the effect of the mechanism of injury on burn severity and that caution is recommended when burn conditions established by porcine contact burn models are used by regulators to guide scald burn prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.