Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28736629›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2017

Biologic therapy in esophageal and gastric malignancies: current therapies and future directions.

Pamela Samson, A Craig Lockhart

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Molecular Pathology of Gastroesophageal Cancer.Surgical pathology clinics · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Tumor organoids to study gastroesophageal cancer: a primer.Journal of molecular cell biology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Esophageal carcinoma: Towards targeted therapies.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2020
    Review
  12. MicroRNA-449b-5p Suppresses Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion of Osteosarcoma by Targeting c-Met.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
  13. Oncology letters · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Angiogenic factors: role in esophageal cancer, a brief review.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2018
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pamela SamsonDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
A Craig LockhartDivision of Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

BASIC SCIENCE RESEARCH TRAINING: CARDIOPULMONARY SURGERYT32HL007776 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DAMIANO, RALPH J · 1994 to 2020
$4.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biologic agents, including targeted antibodies as well as immunomodulators, are demonstrating unparalleled development and study across the entire spectrum of human malignancy. This review summarizes the current state of biologic therapies for esophageal, esophagogastric, and gastric malignancies, including those that target human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), c-Met, mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) and immunomodulators. We focus primarily on agents that have been included in phase II and III clinical trials in locally advanced, progressive, or metastatic esophageal and gastric malignancies. At this time, only two biologic therapies are recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN): trastuzumab for patients with esophageal/esophagogastric or gastric adenocarcinomas with HER2 overexpression and ramucirumab, a VEGFR-2 inhibitor, as a second-line therapy for metastatic disease. However, recent reports of increases in overall and progression-free survival for agents including pertuzumab, apatinib, and pembrolizumab will likely increase the use of targeted biologic therapy in clinical practice for esophageal and gastric malignancies.

Indexed as

biologic therapyEsophageal cancergastric cancerimmunomodulator therapy

Identifiers

PMID28736629
PMCPMC5506284
OpenAlexW2574187866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.