Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28736391›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted infections2017

'I wanted to safeguard the baby': a qualitative study to understand the experiences of Option B+ for pregnant women and the potential implications for 'test-and-treat' in four sub-Saharan African settings.

Estelle McLean, Jenny Renju, Joyce Wamoyi, Dominic Bukenya, William Ddaaki, Kathryn Church, Basia Zaba, Alison Wringe

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Predictors of Viremia in Postpartum Women on Antiretroviral Therapy.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2020
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. "BMJ global health · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Estelle McLeanMalawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit, Karonga, Malawi.
Jenny RenjuFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5650-1902
Joyce WamoyiNational Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Dominic BukenyaMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute Research Unit on AIDS, Entebbe, Uganda.
William DdaakiRakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda.
Kathryn ChurchFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Basia ZabaFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Alison WringeFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

East Africa International Epidemiology Database to evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) Regional ConsortiumU01AI069911 · NIAID · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI Leslie Anne Enane, AGGREY SEMWENDERO SEMEERE · 2006 to 2026
$57.7M
Medical Research Council G0902143NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore what influences on engagement with Option B+ in four sub-Saharan African settings.

methodsIn-depth interviews were conducted in 2015, with 22 HIV-positive women who had been pregnant since Option B+ was available, and 15 healthcare workers (HCWs) involved in HIV service delivery. Participants were purposely selected from four health and demographic surveillance sites in Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda. A thematic content analysis was conducted to investigate what influenced engagement with Option B+.

resultsFeeling 'ready' was key to pregnant women accepting antiretroviral treatment (ART) on the same day as diagnosis at antenatal clinic; this was influenced by previous knowledge of HIV-positive status, interactions with HCWs and relationship with their partners. The desire to protect their unborn infant was the main issue that motivated women to initiate treatment, temporarily over-riding barriers to starting ART. Many HCWs recognised that pressurising women into starting ART may lead them to stop treatment following delivery. However, their own responsibility to protect the infant sometimes drove HCWs to use strong persuasive techniques to initiate pregnant women onto ART as early as possible, occasionally causing women to disengage.

conclusionsProtecting the baby superseded feelings of unpreparedness for lifelong ART and may explain poor retention observed in Option B+ programmes. Women may benefit from more time to accept their status, and counselling on the long-term value of ART beyond the pregnancy and breastfeeding period. Strategies to promote readiness for same-day initiation of lifelong treatment are urgently needed, and may provide important lessons for universal test-and-treat implementation.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringPregnant PeopleAdultAfrica South of the SaharaAnti-HIV AgentsBreast FeedingFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalInterviews as TopicMedication AdherencePatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousQualitative ResearchAnti-HIV AgentsAFRICAANTERETROVIRAL THERAPYHIVPREGNANCYQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID28736391
PMCPMC5739848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.