Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28736318›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of urology2018

Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Targeted

Michael A Gorin, Steven P Rowe, Hiten D Patel, Igor Vidal, Margarita Mana-Ay, Mehrbod S Javadi, Lilja B Solnes, Ashley E Ross, Edward M Schaeffer, Trinity J Bivalacqua and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05936658 (A Multi-center, Open-label, Single Arm Phase III Clinical Trial for the Diagnostic Efficacy Assessment and Safety Evaluation by [18F]Florastamin PET/CT Imaging Examination in Patients With Suspected Recurrent or Metastatic Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05936658 phase3active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Multi-center, Open-label, Single Arm Phase III Clinical Trial for the Diagnostic Efficacy Assessment and Safety Evaluation by [18F]Florastamin PET/CT Imaging Examination in Patients With Suspected Recurrent or Metastatic Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorFutureChemRan2023 to 2025Enrolled138ConditionsHigh Risk Prostate CarcinomaArms[F-18]Florastamin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. PSMA PET for primary lymph node staging of intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer: an expedited systematic review.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. AnCurrent radiopharmaceuticals · 2024
    Trial
  4. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Trial
  5. Radiology · 2022
    Trial
  6. Prospective, Single-Arm Trial Evaluating Changes in Uptake Patterns on Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-TargetedJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Diagnostic Performance ofClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Trial
  9. Pelvic lymph-node staging withEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Trial
  10. [The Journal of urology · 2020
    Trial
  11. Prospective Evaluation of PSMA-TargetedJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2020
    Trial
  12. A Prospective Study onJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Trial
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Predictors ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Appropriate Use Criteria for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET Imaging.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael A GorinThe James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: mgorin1@jhmi.edu.
Steven P RoweThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Hiten D PatelThe James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Igor VidalDepartment of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Margarita Mana-AyThe James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Mehrbod S JavadiThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lilja B SolnesThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ashley E RossThe James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Edward M SchaefferDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Trinity J BivalacquaThe James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Alan W PartinThe James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kenneth J PientaThe James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Zsolt SzaboThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Angelo M De MarzoDepartment of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Martin G PomperThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Mohamad E AllafThe James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM George NELSON · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
Targeting FOXA1-downstream pathways: a novel therapeutic strategy for castration-resistant prostate cancerP50CA180995 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ABDULKADIR, SARKI A., HUSSAIN, MAHA H · 2015 to 2025
$19.9M
PSMA-based Cancer Imaging AgentsR01CA134675 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI POMPER, MARTIN G · 2009 to 2025
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180995NCI NIH HHS R01 CA134675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe prospectively evaluated the diagnostic performance of prostate specific membrane antigen targeted MATERIALS AND

methodsMen with clinically localized high or very high risk prostate cancer were imaged with

resultsA total of 25 men contributed analyzable data to this study. Seven of these patients (28%) were found to have 1 or more positive lymph nodes on surgical pathology. Sites of radiotracer uptake were identified in the prostate of all imaged patients. The 2 readers identified the same number of prostatic lesions in 22 patients (88%), of whom all had at least 1 intraprostatic lesion in common between the 2 reads. Additionally, the readers assigned the same N stage to 46 of 50 individual lymph node packets (92%). Following reconciliation of the relatively few discordant imaging reads, 7 patients (28%) were found to have 1 or more sites of radiotracer uptake in the pelvis consistent with N1 disease, resulting in 71.4% sensitivity (95% CI 29.0-96.3) and 88.9% specificity (95% CI 65.3-98.6). Analysis at the level of individual nodal packets resulted in 66.7% sensitivity (95% CI 29.9-92.5) and 92.7% specificity (95% CI 80.1-98.5). Three men (12%) had evidence of M1a disease.

conclusions

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overHumansLymph Node ExcisionLysineMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProspective StudiesProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRadiopharmaceuticalsRiskUrea2-(3-(1-carboxy-5-((6-fluoropyridine-3-carbonyl)amino)pentyl)ureido)pentanedioic acidLysineProstate-Specific AntigenRadiopharmaceuticalsUrea2-(3-(1-carboxy-5-((6-fluoropyridine-3-carbonyl)amino)pentyl)ureido)pentanedioic aciddiagnosispositron-emission tomographyprostatic neoplasmstomographyX-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID28736318
PMCPMC5802365
OpenAlexW2736955806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.