Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28735899›Full record

ArticleMolecular cell2017

Mot1, Ino80C, and NC2 Function Coordinately to Regulate Pervasive Transcription in Yeast and Mammals.

Yong Xue, Suman K Pradhan, Fei Sun, Constantinos Chronis, Nancy Tran, Trent Su, Christopher Van, Ajay Vashisht, James Wohlschlegel, Craig L Peterson and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cell, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mot1 regulation of promoter binding by TBP varies with stress and gene expression levels independently of coactivator dependence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Hexasomal particles: consequence or also consequential?Current opinion in genetics & development · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yong XueDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Suman K PradhanDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Fei SunDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Constantinos ChronisDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Nancy TranDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Trent SuDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Christopher VanProgram in Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA.
Ajay VashishtDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
James WohlschlegelDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Craig L PetersonProgram in Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA.
H T Marc TimmersRegenerative Medicine Center and Center for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CT Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Siavash K KurdistaniDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Michael F CareyDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Electronic address: mcarey@mednet.ucla.edu.
University of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

Roles of sumoylation and alternative polyadenylation in cellular reprogrammingP01GM099134 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PLATH, KATHRIN · 2011 to 2021
$20.3M
Regulation of chromatin dynamicsR35GM122519 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI Craig L Peterson · 2017 to 2026
$9.2M
Interplay Between Chromatin and Co-Activator ComplexesR01GM074701 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CAREY, MICHAEL F · 2005 to 2025
$6.7M
YEAST CHROMATIN STRUCTURE/FUNCTIONR01GM054096 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI PETERSON, CRAIG L · 1997 to 2017
$5.7M
Proteolytic Control of Iron Metabolism by the Ubiquitin Ligase FBXL5R01GM089778 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WOHLSCHLEGEL, JAMES AKIRA · 2010 to 2023
$4.0M
Dynamics of Histone Acetylation in Cancer Cell PhysiologyR01CA178415 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KURDISTANI, SIAVASH · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA178415NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM099134NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM054096NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074701NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089778NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pervasive transcription initiates from cryptic promoters and is observed in eukaryotes ranging from yeast to mammals. The Set2-Rpd3 regulatory system prevents cryptic promoter function within expressed genes. However, conserved systems that control pervasive transcription within intergenic regions have not been well established. Here we show that Mot1, Ino80 chromatin remodeling complex (Ino80C), and NC2 co-localize on chromatin and coordinately suppress pervasive transcription in S. cerevisiae and murine embryonic stem cells (mESCs). In yeast, all three proteins bind subtelomeric heterochromatin through a Sir3-stimulated mechanism and to euchromatin via a TBP-stimulated mechanism. In mESCs, the proteins bind to active and poised TBP-bound promoters along with promoters of polycomb-silenced genes apparently lacking TBP. Depletion of Mot1, Ino80C, or NC2 by anchor away in yeast or RNAi in mESCs leads to near-identical transcriptome phenotypes, with new subtelomeric transcription in yeast, and greatly increased pervasive transcription in both yeast and mESCs.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticAdenosine TriphosphatasesATPases Associated with Diverse Cellular ActivitiesBinding SitesCell LineDNA-Binding ProteinsEmbryonic Stem CellsEuchromatinGene Expression Regulation, FungalGene SilencingGenotypeHeterochromatinPhenotypePhosphoproteinsPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingAdenosine TriphosphatasesATPases Associated with Diverse Cellular ActivitiesBTAF1 protein, mouseBUR6 protein, S cerevisiaeDNA-Binding Proteinsdown-regulator of transcription 1EuchromatinHeterochromatinINO80 complex, S cerevisiaeINO80 protein, mouseMOT1 protein, S cerevisiaePhosphoproteinsRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSilent Information Regulator Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiaeSIR3 protein, S cerevisiaeTATA-Binding Protein Associated FactorsTATA-Box Binding ProteinTranscription FactorsTranscription Factor TFIIDheterochromatinIno80Mot1NC2pervasive transcriptionpolycombpromotersilencingSir3

Identifiers

PMID28735899
PMCPMC5573681
OpenAlexW2623255489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.