Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28735708›Full record

ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2017

Brain and Social Networks: Fundamental Building Blocks of Human Experience.

Emily B Falk, Danielle S Bassett

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The Relative Contributions of Traits and Contexts on Social Network Learning.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025
    Article
  7. The neuroexistentialism of social connectedness and loneliness.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Emerging Science of Interacting Minds.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily B FalkAnnenberg School of Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Marketing, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: falk@asc.upenn.edu.
Danielle S BassettDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: dsb@seas.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Can neuroscience dramatically improve our ability to design health communicationsDP2DA035156 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FALK, EMILY · 2012 to 2012
$2.3M
NIDA NIH HHS DP2 DA035156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How do brains shape social networks, and how do social ties shape the brain? Social networks are complex webs by which ideas spread among people. Brains comprise webs by which information is processed and transmitted among neural units. While brain activity and structure offer biological mechanisms for human behaviors, social networks offer external inducers or modulators of those behaviors. Together, these two axes represent fundamental contributors to human experience. Integrating foundational knowledge from social and developmental psychology and sociology on how individuals function within dyads, groups, and societies with recent advances in network neuroscience can offer new insights into both domains. Here, we use the example of how ideas and behaviors spread to illustrate the potential of multilayer network models.

Indexed as

Social SupportBrainCognitionHumansInternetModels, NeurologicalNerve NetNeural PathwaysNeurosciencescommunicationmultiscalenetworksneuroimagingneurosciencesocial networks

Identifiers

PMID28735708
PMCPMC8590886
OpenAlexW2738270821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.