Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28735447›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2018

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Two Child Abuse and Neglect Primary Prevention Programs for US States.

Cora Peterson, Curtis Florence, Robert Thomas, Joanne Klevens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Systematic Review of Per Person Violence Costs.American journal of preventive medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Integrating Retention Rates into Economic Analyses of Prevention Interventions.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cora PetersonNational Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Mailstop F-62, 4770 Buford Highway, Atlanta, GA, 30341, USA. cora.peterson@cdc.hhs.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7955-0977
Curtis FlorenceNational Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Mailstop F-62, 4770 Buford Highway, Atlanta, GA, 30341, USA.
Robert ThomasNational Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Mailstop F-62, 4770 Buford Highway, Atlanta, GA, 30341, USA.
Joanne KlevensNational Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Mailstop F-62, 4770 Buford Highway, Atlanta, GA, 30341, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We assessed the US state-level budget and societal impact of implementing two child abuse and neglect (CAN) primary prevention programs. CAN cost estimates and data from two prevention programs (Child-Parent Centers and Nurse-Family Partnership) were combined with current population, cost, and CAN incidence data by US state. A cost-benefit mathematical model for each program by US state compared program costs with the future monetary value of benefits from reduced CAN. The models used a lifetime time horizon from government payer and societal perspectives. Both programs could potentially avert CAN among tens of thousands of children across the country. Lower costs from reduced CAN may substantially offset, but not always entirely eliminate, payers' program implementation cost. Results are sensitive to the rate of CAN in each US state. Given the considerable lifetime societal cost of CAN, including victims' lost work productivity, the programs were cost saving from the societal perspective in all US states using base case methods. This analysis represents an overall minimum return on payers' investment because averted CAN is just one of many positive health and educational outcomes associated with these programs and non-monetary benefits from reduced CAN were not included. Translating cost and effectiveness research on injury prevention programs for local conditions might increase decision makers' adoption of effective programs.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisPrimary PreventionAdolescentChildChild AbuseChild, PreschoolHumansProgram EvaluationUnited StatesChild abuseCost-benefit analysis

Identifiers

PMID28735447
PMCPMC5777909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.