Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28735426›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2018

Diet Versus Phylogeny: a Comparison of Gut Microbiota in Captive Colobine Monkey Species.

Vanessa L Hale, Chia L Tan, Kefeng Niu, Yeqin Yang, Rob Knight, Qikun Zhang, Duoying Cui, Katherine R Amato

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Gut microbial community in proboscis monkeys (Royal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Vanessa L HaleMicrobiome Program, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. vreynolds@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8531-7001
Chia L TanSan Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research, Escondido, CA, 92027, USA.
Kefeng NiuFanjingshan National Nature Reserve Administration, Tongren, China.
Yeqin YangFanjingshan National Nature Reserve Administration, Tongren, China.
Rob KnightDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Qikun ZhangZhejiang Institute of Microbiology, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China.
Duoying CuiBeijing Key Laboratory of Captive Wildlife Technologies, Beijing Zoo, Beijing, 100044, China.
Katherine R AmatoDepartment of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve · CNGuangzhou Zoo · CNInstitute of Microbiology · CNMayo Clinic · USNorthwestern University · USSan Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both diet and host phylogeny shape the gut microbial community, and separating out the effects of these variables can be challenging. In this study, high-throughput sequencing was used to evaluate the impact of diet and phylogeny on the gut microbiota of nine colobine monkey species (N = 64 individuals). Colobines are leaf-eating monkeys that fare poorly in captivity-often exhibiting gastrointestinal (GI) problems. This study included eight Asian colobines (Rhinopithecus brelichi, Rhinopithecus roxellana, Rhinopithecus bieti, Pygathrix nemaeus, Nasalis larvatus, Trachypithecus francoisi, Trachypithecus auratus, and Trachypithecus vetulus) and one African colobine (Colobus guereza). Monkeys were housed at five different captive institutes: Panxi Wildlife Rescue Center (Guizhou, China), Beijing Zoo, Beijing Zoo Breeding Center, Singapore Zoo, and Singapore Zoo Primate Conservation Breeding Center. Captive diets varied widely between institutions, but within an institution, all colobine monkey species were fed nearly identical or identical diets. In addition, four monkey species were present at multiple captive institutes. This allowed us to parse the effects of diet and phylogeny in these captive colobines. Gut microbial communities clustered weakly by host species and strongly by diet, and overall, colobine phylogenetic relationships were not reflected in gut microbiota analyses. Core microbiota analyses also identified several key taxa-including microbes within the Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae families-that were shared by over 90% of the monkeys in this study. Microbial species within these families include many butyrate producers that are important for GI health. These results highlight the importance of diet in captive colobines.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeHost SpecificityPhylogenyAnimal FeedAnimalsAnimals, WildAnimals, ZooBacteriaChinaColobinaeDietSpecies SpecificityColobineDietGut microbiotaPhylogenyPrimate

Identifiers

PMID28735426
OpenAlexW2737450339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.