Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28735376›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2018

The Socio-economic Impact of Bariatric Surgery.

Arendse Tange Larsen, Betina Højgaard, Rikke Ibsen, Jakob Kjellberg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Long-Term Healthcare-Related Costs Eight Years After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Nationwide Register-Based Study.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arendse Tange LarsenUniversity of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1353, Copenhagen, Denmark. arendse.tange.larsen@live.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-3510-7230
Betina HøjgaardDanish Institute for Local and Regional Government Research, KORA, Købmagergade 22, 1150, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rikke Ibseni2minds, Møllegade 32, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark.
Jakob KjellbergDanish Institute for Local and Regional Government Research, KORA, Købmagergade 22, 1150, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA recurring argument for bariatric surgery is cost savings due to sustained weight loss and reductions in comorbidities. However, studies prompting this argument tend to focus only on health care costs, and in some of them, cost changes after surgery have been modelled. The aim of this study was to generate real-world evidence on the socio-economic impact of bariatric surgery, by evaluating the effect on both direct and indirect costs. MATERIALS AND

methodsUsing real-world data from national registries, predictions of health care costs, social transfer payments and income were performed for a surgically treated individual and compared to those for a similar but non-surgically treated individual 3 years before and after surgery. Secondly, the relative risks for health care costs, social transfer payments and income of a surgical group compared with a non-surgical group were estimated. The non-surgical group was defined as being eligible for bariatric surgery but not undergoing it.

resultsBariatric surgery was associated with higher, but insignificantly so, health care costs, primarily due to an increase in somatic inpatient services. A significant decrease in costs of drugs was seen, especially for anti-diabetic medication. Bariatric surgery had a slight positive effect on social transfer payments and no significant effect on income.

conclusionsThere are no cost savings of bariatric surgery in the short run. Further real-world evidence over a longer period of time is needed to examine whether the higher health care costs will eventually be counterbalanced, making bariatric surgery a profitable intervention in a socio-economic perspective.

Indexed as

AdultBariatric SurgeryComorbidityCost SavingsFemaleHealth Care CostsHealth ExpendituresHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic FactorsWeight LossBariatric surgeryEconomic evaluationHealth care costsReal-world evidenceSocio-economics

Identifiers

PMID28735376
OpenAlexW2737790635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.