ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2017
The Effect of Nanosecond, High-Voltage Electric Pulses on the Shape and Permeability of Polymersome GUVs.
Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polymersomes, vesicles composed of block copolymers, are promising candidates as membrane alternatives and functional containers, e.g., as potential carriers for functional molecules because of their stability and tunable membrane properties. In the scope of possible use for membrane protein delivery to cells by electrofusion, we investigated the cytotoxicity of such polymersomes as well as the effects of nanosecond electric pulses with variable repetition rate on the shape and permeability of polymersomes in buffers with different conductivities. The polymersomes did not show cytotoxic effects to CHO and B16-F1 cells in vitro in concentrations up to 250 µg/mL (for 48 h) or 1.35 mg/mL (for 60 min), which renders them suitable for interacting with living cells. We observed a significant effect of the pulse repetition rate on electrodeformation of the polymersomes. The electrodeformation was most pronounced in low conductivity buffer, which is favorable for performing electrofusion with cells. However, despite more pronounced deformation at higher pulse repetition rate, the electroporation performance of polymersomes was unaffected and remained in similar ranges both at 10 Hz and 10 kHz. This phenomenon is possibly due to the higher stability and rigidity of polymer vesicles, compared to liposomes, and can serve as an advantage (or disadvantage) depending on the aim in employing polymersomes such as stable membrane alternative architectures or drug vehicles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28735341What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.