Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28734257›Full record

ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2017

Comparison of femoropopliteal artery stents under axial and radial compression, axial tension, bending, and torsion deformations.

Kaspars Maleckis, Paul Deegan, William Poulson, Cole Sievers, Anastasia Desyatova, Jason MacTaggart, Alexey Kamenskiy

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Off-label use of interwoven carotid stent in common femoral artery occlusion after surgery.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaspars MaleckisDepartment of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Paul DeeganDepartment of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
William PoulsonDepartment of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Cole SieversDepartment of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Anastasia DesyatovaDepartment of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Jason MacTaggartDepartment of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States. Electronic address: jmactaggart@unmc.edu.
Alexey KamenskiyDepartment of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States. Electronic address: Alexey.Kamenskiy@unmc.edu.
University of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

Optimized Stents for the Femoropopliteal ArteryR01HL125736 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA OMAHA · PI KAMENSKIY, ALEXEY, MACTAGGART, JASON · 2015 to 2024
$6.3M
Computational Tool to Assess Performance of the Aortic Trauma Stent-GraftsF32HL124905 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DESYATOVA, ANASTASIA S · 2015 to 2017
$173k
NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL124905NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL125736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High failure rates of Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) stenting appear to be associated with the inability of certain stent designs to accommodate severe biomechanical environment of the femoropopliteal artery (FPA) that bends, twists, and axially compresses during limb flexion. Twelve Nitinol stents (Absolute Pro, Supera, Lifestent, Innova, Zilver, Smart Control, Smart Flex, EverFlex, Viabahn, Tigris, Misago, and Complete SE) were quasi-statically tested under bench-top axial and radial compression, axial tension, bending, and torsional deformations. Stents were compared in terms of force-strain behavior, stiffness, and geometrical shape under each deformation mode. Tigris was the least stiff stent under axial compression (6.6N/m axial stiffness) and bending (0.1N/m) deformations, while Smart Control was the stiffest (575.3N/m and 105.4N/m, respectively). Under radial compression Complete SE was the stiffest (892.8N/m), while Smart Control had the lowest radial stiffness (211.0N/m). Viabahn and Supera had the lowest and highest torsional stiffness (2.2μNm/° and 959.2μNm/°), respectively. None of the 12 PAD stents demonstrated superior characteristics under all deformation modes and many experienced global buckling and diameter pinching. Though it is yet to be determined which of these deformation modes might have greater clinical impact, results of the current analysis may help guide development of new stents with improved mechanical characteristics.

Indexed as

Materials TestingProsthesis DesignStentsAlloysEquipment DesignFemoral ArteryHumansMechanical PhenomenaAlloysnitinolFemoropopliteal arteryMechanical testingPeripheral Arterial DiseaseStent

Identifiers

PMID28734257
PMCPMC5623954
OpenAlexW2735352213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.