Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28734187›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2017

Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of senile intertrochanteric fractures: Case report.

Xiangping Luo, Shengmao He, Dingshi Zeng, Lijun Lin, Qi Li

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05134805 (Functional Outcomes of Hemiarthroplasty Versus Cephalo-medullary Fixation in the Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05134805 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Functional Outcomes of Hemiarthroplasty Versus Cephalo-medullary Fixation in the Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures

TypeinterventionalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2018 to 2021Enrolled30ConditionsFracture of FemurArmsBipolar hemiarthroplasty , proximal femoral nail
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients over 70 years: Boon or bane?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xiangping LuoOrthopaedic Department, People's Hospital of Leiyang, Hunan, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: luoxiangping8@sina.com.
Shengmao HeOrthopaedic Department of Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: pshxf8@sina.com.
Dingshi ZengRadiology Department, People's Hospital of Leiyang, Hunan, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: heshunq@outlook.com.
Lijun LinOrthopaedic Department of Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: chhuang09@sina.com.
Qi LiOrthopaedic Department of Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: qili565@sina.com.
Southern Medical University · CNHunan Provincial People's Hospital · CNThe People's Hospital of LinXia · CNZhujiang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary hemiarthroplasty was recommended by some surgeons as the preferred choice in treating unstable senile intertrochanteric fractures with osteoporosis. However, many studies reported that proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) currently was as an optimal implant for the treatment of different type of intertrochanteric fractures. Which method is better for treating senile intertrochanteric fractures remains controversial due to the insufficient clinical evidences.

methodsWe reviewed all consecutive senile intertrochanteric fractures treated with PFNA or cemented hemiarthroplasty at our institution between July 2010 and March 2015. The primary outcome measures were postoperative complications, reoperation rate and hip function. The secondary outcome measures were intraoperative blood loss, transfusion rate, surgical time, postoperative hemoglobin, hospital stay and 1- year mortality.

resultsSeventy-one patients in PFNA group and 52 patients in hemiarthroplasty group were included for analysis. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding to the orthopaedic complications, reoperation rate, surgical time and Harris Hip Score at 1year follow-up. Significant differences were found between PFNA and hemiarthroplasty group in comparison of intraoperative blood loss (P<0.001), transfusion rate, medical complications (P=0.037) and hospital stay (P=0.001). Patients treated with hemiarthroplasty had a trend of higher postoperative 1- year mortality compared to those underwent PFNA but this was statistically not significant (P=0.134).

conclusionsThese findings indicate that PFNA has obvious advantages over hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of senile intertrochanteric fractures. Hemiarthroplasty in treating these fractures is associated with greater surgical trauma and higher incidence of postoperative medical complications.

Indexed as

Case reportHemiarthroplastyIntertrochanteric fracture

Identifiers

PMID28734187
PMCPMC5521030
OpenAlexW2735321678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.