Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28734080›Full record

ArticleBJU international2018

Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy and cystectomy with the aid of a transurethral port: a feasibility study.

Jian Su, Qingyi Zhu, Lin Yuan, Yang Zhang, Qingling Zhang, Yunfei Wei

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BJU international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jian SuDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Qingyi ZhuDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9838-6455
Lin YuanDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Yang ZhangDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Qingling ZhangDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Yunfei WeiDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the surgical technique and report early outcomes of transurethral assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) radical prostatectomy (RP) and LESS radical cystectomy (RC) in a single institution. MATERIALS AND

methodsBetween December 2014 and March 2016, a total of 114 LESS RPs and RCs were performed, comprising 68 LESS RPs, 38 LESS RCs with cutaneous ureterostomy (CU) and eight LESS RCs with orthotopic ileal neobladder (OIN). Access was achieved via a single-port, with four channels placed through a transumblical incision. After the apex of prostate was separated from the urethra, a self-developed port ('Zhu's port') was inserted through the urethra to facilitate resection of prostate and urethrovesical anastomosis. The peri-operative and postoperative data were collected and analysed retrospectively. Patients were followed up postoperatively for evidence of long-term side effects.

resultsAll the procedures were completed successfully. No conversion to conventional laparoscopic surgery was necessary. For LESS RP, the average operating time was 152 min. Estimated blood loss was 117 mL. The mean hospital stay was 16.4 days after surgery. For LESS RC with CU and LESS RC with OIN, the mean operating times were 215 and 328 min, mean estimated blood loss was 175 and 252 mL, and mean hospital stay was 9.4 and 18.2 days, respectively. Six patients required blood transfusion (5.26%). Intra-operative complications occurred in two patients (1.75%), and postoperative complications in nine (7.89%). Fourteen out of 68 (20.6%) patients who underwent LESS RP had positive surgical margins. Follow-up ranged from 10 to 30.6 months. In the prostate cancer cases, good urinary control was observed in 35.3%, 97.1% and 100% of patients at 1, 6 and 12 months after the operation, respectively, while biochemical recurrence was observed in 11.8% patients. In the bladder cancer cases, two patients had local recurrence and two patients had distant metastasis.

conclusionOur results showed that LESS RP and LESS RC are feasible and safe with the aid of a transurethral port. Operating through the transurethral port might overcome the challenges posed by the single-port laparoscopic approach.

Indexed as

AgedBlood Loss, SurgicalCohort StudiesCystectomyDisease-Free SurvivalFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLaparoscopesLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryOperative TimePrognosislaparoscopyLESSradical cystectomyradical prostatectomy

Identifiers

PMID28734080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.