ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2017
On the Nature of Mass Spectrometer Analyzer Contamination.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linking ambient fire emissions to respiratory effects using gelatin filter sampling.Journal of hazardous materials · 2026Article
- Is the Signal Worth the Noise? A Practical Guide to Charge-Tagging for ESI-MS Reaction Monitoring.ACS organic & inorganic Au · 2026Article
- Ultra-high throughput mass spectrometry with ultra high-speed separations: differential mobility spectrometry-acoustic ejection mass spectrometry (DAEMS).Bioanalysis · 2025Article
- Review of the Use of Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry in Clinical Laboratories: Part II-Operations.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2022Review
- Methods for Quantifying the Metabolic Boundary Fluxes of Cell Cultures in Large Cohorts by High-Resolution Hydrophilic Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2022Article
- Metabolomics: The Key to Unraveling the Role of the Microbiome in Visceral Pain Neurotransmission.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for clinical diagnostics.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022Review
- Observation of charged droplets from electrospray ionization (ESI) plumes in API mass spectrometers.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2021Article
- Article
- Design Characteristics to Eliminate the Need for Parameter Optimization in Nanoflow ESI-MS.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2019Article
- Unraveling Posttranslational Modification Complexity: Advances in Quantitative Histone Proteoform Mass Spectrometry.Mass spectrometry reviewsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sample throughput in electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) is limited by the need for frequent ion path cleaning to remove accumulated debris that can lead to charging and general performance degradation. Contamination of ion optics within the vacuum system is particularly problematic as routine cleaning requires additional time for cycling the vacuum pumps. Differential mobility spectrometry (DMS) can select targeted ion species for transmission, thereby reducing the total number of charged particles entering the vacuum system. In this work, we characterize the nature of instrument contamination, describe efforts to improve mass spectrometer robustness by applying DMS prefiltering to reduce contamination of the vacuum ion optics, and demonstrate the capability of DMS to extend the interval between mass spectrometer cleaning. In addition, we introduce a new approach to effectively detect large charged particles formed during the electrospray ionization (ESI) process. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28733968What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.