ReviewJournal of medical systems2017
Security Techniques for the Electronic Health Records.
Review in Journal of medical systems, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 262 citations in OpenAlex.
- Needs for mobile and internet-based psychological intervention in patients with self-injury and suicide-related behaviors: a qualitative systematic review.BMC psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- A Hybrid Architecture (CO-CONNECT) to Facilitate Rapid Discovery and Access to Data Across the United Kingdom in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Development Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- A New Playbook: State-Driven Solutions for Resilient Health Data.The Milbank quarterly · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for precision oncology from phenotyping and drug discovery to clinical translation.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Model-Informed Precision Dosing: Conceptual Framework for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Integrating Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Within Population Health Informatics.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Introducing and Validating a Minimum Data Set and Core Functionalities for Remote Poststroke Home Monitoring: "A Cross-Sectional Study".Health science reports · 2026Article
- From 5G smart hospitals to 6G-enabled learning hospitals: a governance-oriented framework for healthcare technology, policy, and responsible deployment.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool.AI and ethics · 2025Article
- Twenty-Five Years of Evolution and Hurdles in Electronic Health Records and Interoperability in Medical Research: Comprehensive Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Review
- Integrating 6G technology in smart hospitals: challenges and opportunities for enhanced healthcare services.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of the Nursing Information Security Questionnaire.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Anomaly-based threat detection in smart health using machine learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Patient Health Record Protection Beyond the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Operations in Health Care: A Scoping Review.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024Review
- Enhancing data practices for Whole Health: Strategies for a transformative future.Learning health systems · 2024Article
- Patient-Generated Health Data (PGHD): Understanding, Requirements, Challenges, and Existing Techniques for Data Security and Privacy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Security vulnerabilities in healthcare: an analysis of medical devices and software.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- Disparate Digital Literacy Levels of Nursing Manager and Staff, Specifically in Nursing Informatics Competencies and Their Causes: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2024Article
- Health Professionals' Ethical, Security, and Patient Safety Concerns Using Digital Health Technologies: A Mixed Method Research Study.Health services insights · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The privacy of patients and the security of their information is the most imperative barrier to entry when considering the adoption of electronic health records in the healthcare industry. Considering current legal regulations, this review seeks to analyze and discuss prominent security techniques for healthcare organizations seeking to adopt a secure electronic health records system. Additionally, the researchers sought to establish a foundation for further research for security in the healthcare industry. The researchers utilized the Texas State University Library to gain access to three online databases: PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL, and ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source. These sources were used to conduct searches on literature concerning security of electronic health records containing several inclusion and exclusion criteria. Researchers collected and analyzed 25 journals and reviews discussing security of electronic health records, 20 of which mentioned specific security methods and techniques. The most frequently mentioned security measures and techniques are categorized into three themes: administrative, physical, and technical safeguards. The sensitive nature of the information contained within electronic health records has prompted the need for advanced security techniques that are able to put these worries at ease. It is imperative for security techniques to cover the vast threats that are present across the three pillars of healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.