Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28733908›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2017

Assessment of Cultivable Oral Bacterial Flora from Important Venomous Snakes of India and Their Antibiotic Susceptibilities.

Innus K Shaikh, Prashant P Dixit, Balasaheb S Pawade, Mugdha Potnis-Lele, Babasaheb P Kurhe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Oral microflora ofOpen veterinary journal · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Chinese guideline for management of snakebites.World journal of emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Infectious Complications Following Snakebite byThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Innus K ShaikhDepartment of Microbiology, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Sub campus Osmanabad, Aurangabad, India.
Prashant P DixitDepartment of Microbiology, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Sub campus Osmanabad, Aurangabad, India. prashantdixit74@gmail.com.
Balasaheb S PawadeHaffkine Biopharmaceutical Corporation Limited, Pune, India.
Mugdha Potnis-LeleEntrepreneurship Development Centre, 100 NCL Innovation Park Campus, Pashan, Pune, India.
Babasaheb P KurheHaffkine Biopharmaceutical Corporation Limited, Pune, India.
Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University · INEntrepreneurship Development Institute of India · INTilak Maharashtra Vidyapeeth · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snakebite is a common, frequently devastating, occupational, socio-economic hazard, and it has a great impact on the rural population of India. Snakebite is a major cause of the human morbidity and mortality since ancient times, as it not only affects the victim by systemic envenomation but also by wound infections originating from deadly pathogenic microorganisms from the oral cavity of the offending snake. The pathogens from the oral cavity of the snake tend to initiate an infection, resulting in gas gangrene, soft tissue necrosis, and permanent physical disabilities. In light of this, the present study is designed to evaluate the oral microbiota of venomous snakes commonly found in India and assessment of their antibiotic susceptibilities. Oral cavity swabs of twenty snakes representing the Indian cobra, Russell's viper, Saw-scaled viper, and Common krait were selected for the study. These materials were enriched using microbiological media to facilitate the growth of bacteria and their subsequent isolation to assess the antibiotic susceptibilities. A total 205 strains were isolated from the oropharyngeal cavity of snakes, which represent the common pathogens, especially Morganella morganii, Escherichia coli, Aeromonas hydrophila, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus species, Micrococcus species, and some anaerobes including Clostridium perfringens. The study can conclude that the oral cavity of the snakes has a diversity of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria are susceptible to several antibiotics. The Gram-negative microorganisms showed 100% susceptibility to imipenem and levofloxacin, whereas Gram-positive microorganisms to azithromycin and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiodiversityIndiaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrobiotaMouthSnakesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID28733908
OpenAlexW2737084710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.