Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28733850›Full record

ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2017

Comparison of Autism Screening in Younger and Older Toddlers.

Raymond Sturner, Barbara Howard, Paul Bergmann, Lydia Stewart, Talin E Afarian

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. What are we optimizing for in autism screening? Examination of algorithmic changes in the M-CHAT.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raymond SturnerPediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. rsturner@childhealthcare.org.
Barbara HowardPediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Paul BergmannForesight Logic, Inc., Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Lydia StewartJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Talin E AfarianLoyola University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Improving Accuracy and Accessibility of Early Autism ScreeningR44MH085399 · NIMH · TOTAL CHILD HEALTH, INC. · PI HOWARD, BARBARA JO · 2009 to 2016
$3.7M
National Institute of Mental Health R44MH085399NIMH NIH HHS R44 MH085399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the effect of age at completion of an autism screening test on item failure rates contrasting older (>20 months) with younger (<20 months) toddlers in a community primary care sample of 73,564 children. Items related to social development were categorized into one of three age sets per criteria from Inada et al. (Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 4(4):605-611, 2010). Younger toddlers produced higher rates of item failure than older toddlers and items in both of the later acquired item sets had higher probability rates for failure than the earliest acquired item set (prior to 8 months). Use of the same items and the same scoring throughout the target age range for autism screening may not be the best strategy for identifying the youngest toddlers at risk for autism.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAutistic DisorderChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleMass ScreeningPrimary Health CareAutism screeningDevelopmental screeningM-CHATTest development

Identifiers

PMID28733850
PMCPMC5711534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.