Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28733827›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2017

Adding Adjuvant Systemic Treatment after Neoadjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer: Review of the Data.

Shetal A Patel, Angela DeMichele

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shetal A PatelPerelman Center for Advanced Medicine, 10th floor, South Tower, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19072, USA.
Angela DeMichelePerelman Center for Advanced Medicine, 10th floor, South Tower, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19072, USA. angela.demichele@uphs.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewResidual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a poor prognostic factor; however, proven strategies to reduce recurrence risk and improve overall survival in this patient population are limited. Previous studies of residual disease have illustrated the importance of tumor intrinsic subtypes in treatment response and mechanisms of resistance. This review summarizes the rationale for various therapeutic approaches as well as completed and ongoing clinical trials for this high-risk group of patients. RECENT

findingsRegimens utilizing additional chemotherapy and targeted therapies (such as PARP inhibitors or bisphosphonates) have met with limited efficacy. Notably, a recently published randomized study of capecitabine in patients with residual disease demonstrated an improvement in disease-free survival and overall survival. While the results for capecitabine are promising, particularly for patients with triple-negative disease, the generalizability of these findings is an open question. Meanwhile, ongoing trials with novel agents that target specific tumor subtypes and the biology of residual disease may improve outcomes for other patient populations.

Indexed as

Antimetabolites, AntineoplasticBreast NeoplasmsCapecitabineChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm, ResidualTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCapecitabineBiomarkersNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPathologic complete responsePostoperative therapyResidual diseaseTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID28733827
OpenAlexW2736892594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.