ArticlePsychopharmacology2017
Pharmacological evidence that 5-HT
Article in Psychopharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Increased risky choice during forced abstinence from fentanyl on the cued rat gambling task.Psychopharmacology · 2025Article
- Individual differences in training time in the rat gambling task are unrelated to subsequent decision-making strategies.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Insight into differing decision-making strategies that underlie cognitively effort-based decision making using computational modeling in rats.Psychopharmacology · 2024Article
- Neurotransmitters crosstalk and regulation in the reward circuit of subjects with behavioral addiction.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Review
- DThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Exploring decision-making strategies in the Iowa gambling task and rat gambling task.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022Article
- 5-HTPsychopharmacology · 2022Article
- Challenges and Opportunities in Animal Models of Gambling-like Behavior.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2020Article
- Acute Lysergic Acid Diethylamide Does Not Influence Reward-Driven Decision Making of C57BL/6 Mice in the Iowa Gambling Task.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
- Relative insensitivity to time-out punishments induced by win-paired cues in a rat gambling task.Psychopharmacology · 2019Article
- Increased motor impulsivity in a rat gambling task during chronic ropinirole treatment: potentiation by win-paired audiovisual cues.Psychopharmacology · 2019Article
- Examining the neurochemical underpinnings of animal models of risky choice: Methodological and analytic considerations.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2019Review
- Prior Exposure to Salient Win-Paired Cues in a Rat Gambling Task Increases Sensitivity to Cocaine Self-Administration and Suppresses Dopamine Efflux in Nucleus Accumbens: Support for the Reward Deficiency Hypothesis of Addiction.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
- Understanding Addiction Using Animal Models.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2019Article
- Brain and Cognition for Addiction Medicine: From Prevention to Recovery Neural Substrates for Treatment of Psychostimulant-Induced Cognitive Deficits.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2019Review
- Monoaminergic modulation of decision-making under risk of punishment in a rat model.Behavioural pharmacology · 2018Article
- Article
- Most rats prefer gambling opportunities featuring win-paired cues that drive risky choice: Synergistic interactions between choice of and choice during the cued rat gambling task.Brain and neuroscience advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleAdding reward-concurrent cues to a rat gambling task (rGT) increases risky choice. This cued version of the task may reflect an "addiction-like" cognitive process, more similar to human gambling than the uncued task. Serotonergic drugs that target 5-HT
objectivesThe aim of this study was to determine the effects of SB 242,084 and M100907, selective antagonists at the 5-HT
resultsSB 242,084 significantly and dose-dependently increased choice of the most optimal option in the cued rGT only, despite concurrently increasing impulsive responses made prematurely on both the cued and uncued rGT. M100907 and Ro-60-0175 did not alter risky decision making, but nevertheless produced the expected decrease in premature responses on both task variants.
conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that the 5-HT
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.