Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28733802›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2017

Assisted reproductive technology treatments and quality of life: a longitudinal study among subfertile women and men.

Francesca Agostini, Fiorella Monti, Federica Andrei, Marcella Paterlini, Stefano Palomba, Giovanni Battista La Sala

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Assessment of Quality of Life in Men Treated for Infertility in Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca AgostiniDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 5, 40127, Bologna, Italy. f.agostini@unibo.it.
Fiorella MontiDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 5, 40127, Bologna, Italy.
Federica AndreiDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 5, 40127, Bologna, Italy.
Marcella PaterliniUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS - ASMN of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Stefano PalombaUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS - ASMN of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Giovanni Battista La SalaUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS - ASMN of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeQuality of life (QoL) may represent a comprehensive indicator for the assessment of the psychological impact of complex clinical conditions, such as infertility. Infertile women have a worse QoL compared to both infertile men and non-infertile controls. However, the initial phases of infertility treatments have been frequently investigated using cross-sectional study designs. This prospective longitudinal study aimed at assessing the health-related QoL change across different phases of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments in subfertile women and men.

methodsEighty-five subfertile women and men undergoing ART cycles were assessed at the beginning of the ovarian stimulation, during oocyte retrieval before discharging, and around 14 days after the embryo transfer. QoL was assessed through the Short Form 36.

resultsIrrespective of the cause of infertility, work status, and age, QoL levels decreased from the first to the third assessment, and women scored significantly lower than men to each QoL indicator. Additionally, a higher number of previous ART failures had a negative impact on QoL, irrespective of gender and the phase of treatment. ART outcome marginally affected women's QoL across time.

conclusionInfertile women have a worse QoL throughout all phases of ARTs compared to men, and this difference increases in infertile patients with more than one previous ART failure.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeReproductive Techniques, AssistedAdultEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansInfertility, FemaleInfertility, MaleLongitudinal StudiesMaleTreatment FailureAssisted reproductive technologyInfertilityLongitudinal studyMenQuality of lifeWomen

Identifiers

PMID28733802
PMCPMC5633563
OpenAlexW2736378941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.