Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28733724›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2017

Motion monitoring during a course of lung radiotherapy with anchored electromagnetic transponders : Quantification of inter- and intrafraction motion and variability of relative transponder positions.

Daniela Schmitt, Simeon Nill, Falk Roeder, Daniela Gompelmann, Felix Herth, Uwe Oelfke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Developments in radiation techniques for thoracic malignancies.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniela SchmittDivision of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. Daniela.Schmitt@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9657-0715
Simeon NillDivision of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Falk RoederClinical Cooperation Unit Molecular Radiooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Daniela GompelmannPneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Felix HerthPneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Uwe OelfkeDivision of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB/TRR 125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAnchored electromagnetic transponders for tumor motion monitoring during lung radiotherapy were clinically evaluated. First, intrafractional motion patterns were analyzed as well as their interfractional variations. Second, intra- and interfractional changes of the geometric transponder positions were investigated. MATERIALS AND

methodsIntrafractional motion data from 7 patients with an upper or middle lobe tumor and three implanted transponders each was used to calculate breathing amplitudes, overall motion amount and motion midlines in three mutual perpendicular directions and three-dimensionally (3D) for 162 fractions. For 6 patients intra- and interfractional variations in transponder distances and in the size of the triangle defined by the transponder locations over the treatment course were determined.

resultsMean 3D values of all fractions were up to 4.0, 4.6 and 3.4 mm per patient for amplitude, overall motion amount and midline deviation, respectively. Intrafractional transponder distances varied with standard deviations up to 3.2 mm, while a maximal triangle shrinkage of 36.5% over 39 days was observed.

conclusionsElectromagnetic real-time motion monitoring was feasible for all patients. Detected respiratory motion was on average modest in this small cohort without lower lobe tumors, but changes in motion midline were of the same size as the amplitudes and greater midline motion can be observed in some fractions. Intra- and interfractional variations of the geometric transponder positions can be large, so for reliable motion management correlation between transponder and tumor motion needs to be evaluated per patient.

Indexed as

TransducersEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisHumansLung NeoplasmsMagnetometryMonitoring, AmbulatoryMotionPatient PositioningRadiotherapy, ConformalReproducibility of ResultsRespiratory MechanicsSensitivity and SpecificityElectromagnetic trackingIntrafraction motionLung radiotherapyMotion managementStability of marker positions

Identifiers

PMID28733724
PMCPMC5614910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.