Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28733632›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

3D anatomical and perfusion MRI for longitudinal evaluation of biomaterials for bone regeneration of femoral bone defect in rats.

Emeline J Ribot, Clement Tournier, Rachida Aid-Launais, Neha Koonjoo, Hugo Oliveira, Aurelien J Trotier, Sylvie Rey, Didier Wecker, Didier Letourneur, Joelle Amedee Vilamitjana and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emeline J RibotCentre de Résonance Magnétique des Systèmes Biologiques, UMR5536, CNRS, Univ. Bordeaux, F-33076, Bordeaux, France. ribot@rmsb.u-bordeaux2.fr.
Clement TournierInserm U1026, Univ. Bordeaux, Tissue Bioengineering, U1026, F-33076, Bordeaux, France.
Rachida Aid-LaunaisInserm U1148, LVTS, X. Bichat Hospital, University Paris Diderot F-75018 Paris, Institut Galilée, University Paris 13, 93430, Villetaneuse, France.
Neha KoonjooCentre de Résonance Magnétique des Systèmes Biologiques, UMR5536, CNRS, Univ. Bordeaux, F-33076, Bordeaux, France.
Hugo OliveiraInserm U1026, Univ. Bordeaux, Tissue Bioengineering, U1026, F-33076, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9715-8052
Aurelien J TrotierCentre de Résonance Magnétique des Systèmes Biologiques, UMR5536, CNRS, Univ. Bordeaux, F-33076, Bordeaux, France.
Sylvie ReyInserm U1026, Univ. Bordeaux, Tissue Bioengineering, U1026, F-33076, Bordeaux, France.
Didier WeckerBruker Biospin MRI GMBH, Ettlingen, Germany.
Didier LetourneurInserm U1148, LVTS, X. Bichat Hospital, University Paris Diderot F-75018 Paris, Institut Galilée, University Paris 13, 93430, Villetaneuse, France.
Joelle Amedee VilamitjanaInserm U1026, Univ. Bordeaux, Tissue Bioengineering, U1026, F-33076, Bordeaux, France.
Sylvain MirauxCentre de Résonance Magnétique des Systèmes Biologiques, UMR5536, CNRS, Univ. Bordeaux, F-33076, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) appears as a good surrogate to Computed Tomography (CT) scan as it does not involve radiation. In this context, a 3D anatomical and perfusion MR imaging protocol was developed to follow the evolution of bone regeneration and the neo-vascularization in femoral bone defects in rats. For this, three different biomaterials based on Pullulan-Dextran and containing either Fucoidan or HydroxyApatite or both were implanted. In vivo MRI, ex vivo micro-CT and histology were performed 1, 3 and 5 weeks after implantation. The high spatially resolved (156 × 182 × 195 µm) anatomical images showed a high contrast from the defects filled with biomaterials that decreased over time due to bone formation. The 3D Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE) imaging with high temporal resolution (1 image/19 s) enabled to detect a modification in the Area-Under-The-Gadolinium-Curve over the weeks post implantation. The high sensitivity of MRI enabled to distinguish which biomaterial was the least efficient for bone regeneration, which was confirmed by micro-CT images and by a lower vessel density observed by histology. In conclusion, the methodology developed here highlights the efficiency of longitudinal MRI for tissue engineering as a routine small animal exam.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsBone RegenerationFemurImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance AngiographyAnimalsBiomarkersDisease Models, AnimalFemaleImmunohistochemistryRatsTissue EngineeringX-Ray MicrotomographyBiocompatible MaterialsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID28733632
PMCPMC5522444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.