Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28733613›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

RNAi screening identifies Trypanosoma brucei stress response protein kinases required for survival in the mouse.

Fernando Fernandez-Cortes, Tiago D Serafim, Jonathan M Wilkes, Nathaniel G Jones, Ryan Ritchie, Richard McCulloch, Jeremy C Mottram

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Promastigote-to-Amastigote Conversion inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Forward Genetics in Apicomplexa Biology: The Host Side of the Story.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Unpicking the Roles of DNA Damage Protein Kinases in Trypanosomatids.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fernando Fernandez-CortesWellcome Centre for Molecular Parasitology and Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9362-2164
Tiago D SerafimWellcome Centre for Molecular Parasitology and Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1606-559X
Jonathan M WilkesWellcome Centre for Molecular Parasitology and Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0920-6967
Nathaniel G JonesWellcome Centre for Molecular Parasitology and Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7328-4487
Ryan RitchieWellcome Centre for Molecular Parasitology and Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Richard McCullochWellcome Centre for Molecular Parasitology and Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5739-976X
Jeremy C MottramWellcome Centre for Molecular Parasitology and Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. jeremy.mottram@york.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5574-3766
Wellcome Centre for Molecular Parasitology · GBNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K006495/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein kinases (PKs) are a class of druggable targets in Trypanosoma brucei, the causative agent of Human African Trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness), yet little is known about which PKs are essential for survival in mammals. A recent kinome-wide RNAi screen with 176 individual bloodstream form Trypanosoma brucei lines identified PKs required for proliferation in culture. In order to assess which PKs are also potential virulence factors essential in vivo, lines were pooled, inoculated into mice, and screened for loss of fitness after 48 h RNAi. The presence of trypanosomes in the bloodstream was assessed using RNAi target sequencing (RITseq) and compared to growth in culture. We identified 49 PKs with a significant loss of fitness in vivo in two independent experiments, and a strong correlation between in vitro and in vivo loss of fitness for the majority. Nine PKs had a more pronounced growth defect in vivo, than in vitro. Amongst these PKs were several with putative functions related to stress responses mediated through the PI3K/TOR or MAPK signaling cascades, which act to protect the parasite from complement-mediated and osmotic lysis. Identification of these virulence-associated PKs provides new insights into T. brucei-host interaction and reveals novel potential protein kinase drug targets.

Indexed as

AnimalsGenes, EssentialMiceProtein KinasesProtozoan ProteinsRNA InterferenceSequence Analysis, RNASignal TransductionTrypanosoma brucei bruceiTrypanosomiasis, AfricanVirulence FactorsProtein KinasesProtozoan ProteinsVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID28733613
PMCPMC5522463
OpenAlexW2735611482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.