Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28733610›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Environmental impact of omnivorous, ovo-lacto-vegetarian, and vegan diet.

Alice Rosi, Pedro Mena, Nicoletta Pellegrini, Silvia Turroni, Erasmo Neviani, Ilario Ferrocino, Raffaella Di Cagno, Luca Ruini, Roberto Ciati, Donato Angelino and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Reversing the great degradation of nature by reducing factors related to cropland expansion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Meat substitutes: Resource demands and environmental footprints.Resources, conservation, and recycling · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Alice RosiHuman Nutrition Unit, Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Pedro MenaHuman Nutrition Unit, Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2150-2977
Nicoletta PellegriniHuman Nutrition Unit, Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parma, Italy. nicoletta.pellegrini@unipr.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9178-5274
Silvia TurroniDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Erasmo NevianiHuman Nutrition Unit, Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Ilario FerrocinoDepartment of Agricultural, Forest and Food Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Raffaella Di CagnoFaculty of Science and Technology, Libera Università di Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Luca RuiniBarilla Center for Food & Nutrition, Parma, Italy.
Roberto CiatiBarilla Center for Food & Nutrition, Parma, Italy.
Donato AngelinoHuman Nutrition Unit, Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5436-7428
Jane MaddockMRC Human Nutrition Research, Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge, CB1 9NL, United Kingdom.
Marco GobbettiFaculty of Science and Technology, Libera Università di Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Furio BrighentiHuman Nutrition Unit, Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Daniele Del RioHuman Nutrition Unit, Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5394-1259
Francesca ScazzinaHuman Nutrition Unit, Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food and beverage consumption has a great impact on the environment, although there is a lack of information concerning the whole diet. The environmental impact of 153 Italian adults (51 omnivores, 51 ovo-lacto-vegetarians, 51 vegans) and the inter-individual variability within dietary groups were assessed in a real-life context. Food intake was monitored with a 7-d dietary record to calculate nutritional values and environmental impacts (carbon, water, and ecological footprints). The Italian Mediterranean Index was used to evaluate the nutritional quality of each diet. The omnivorous choice generated worse carbon, water and ecological footprints than other diets. No differences were found for the environmental impacts of ovo-lacto-vegetarians and vegans, which also had diets more adherent to the Mediterranean pattern. A high inter-individual variability was observed through principal component analysis, showing that some vegetarians and vegans have higher environmental impacts than those of some omnivores. Thus, regardless of the environmental benefits of plant-based diets, there is a need for thinking in terms of individual dietary habits. To our knowledge, this is the first time environmental impacts of three dietary regimens are evaluated using individual recorded dietary intakes rather than hypothetical diet or diets averaged over a population.

Indexed as

Diet, VeganEnvironmentVegansVegetariansAdolescentAdultDietFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28733610
PMCPMC5522483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.