Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28733290›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2017

Feral Swine in the United States Have Been Exposed to both Avian and Swine Influenza A Viruses.

Brigitte E Martin, Hailiang Sun, Margaret Carrel, Fred L Cunningham, John A Baroch, Katie C Hanson-Dorr, Sean G Young, Brandon Schmit, Jacqueline M Nolting, Kyoung-Jin Yoon and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Influenza D virus infection in China, 2022-2023.Emerging microbes & infections · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. CAFOs, novel influenza, and the need for One Health approaches.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Brigitte E MartinDepartment of Basic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, USA.
Hailiang SunDepartment of Basic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, USA.
Margaret CarrelDepartment of Geographical & Sustainability Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Fred L CunninghamMississippi Field Station, National Wildlife Research Center, Wildlife Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Mississippi State, Mississippi, USA.
John A BarochNational Wildlife Research Center, Wildlife Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Katie C Hanson-DorrMississippi Field Station, National Wildlife Research Center, Wildlife Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Mississippi State, Mississippi, USA.
Sean G YoungDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Brandon SchmitNational Wildlife Research Center, Wildlife Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Jacqueline M NoltingDepartment of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Kyoung-Jin YoonDepartment of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Mark W LutmanU.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Kerri PedersenU.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Kelly LagerVirus and Prion Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Andrew S BowmanDepartment of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Richard D SlemonsDepartment of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
David R SmithDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, USA.
Thomas DeLibertoNational Wildlife Research Center, Wildlife Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA Thomas.J.DeLiberto@aphis.usda.gov wan@cvm.msstate.edu.
Xiu-Feng WanDepartment of Basic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, USA Thomas.J.DeLiberto@aphis.usda.gov wan@cvm.msstate.edu.

Funding

Zinc dependent conformational changes in AdcR and their impact on DNA bindingP20GM103646 · NIGMS · MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY · PI THIBAUDEAU, GISELLE · 2013 to 2022
$21.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Influenza A viruses (IAVs) in swine can cause sporadic infections and pandemic outbreaks among humans, but how avian IAV emerges in swine is still unclear. Unlike domestic swine, feral swine are free ranging and have many opportunities for IAV exposure through contacts with various habitats and animals, including migratory waterfowl, a natural reservoir for IAVs. During the period from 2010 to 2013, 8,239 serum samples were collected from feral swine across 35 U.S. states and tested against 45 contemporary antigenic variants of avian, swine, and human IAVs; of these, 406 (4.9%) samples were IAV antibody positive. Among 294 serum samples selected for antigenic characterization, 271 cross-reacted with ≥1 tested virus, whereas the other 23 did not cross-react with any tested virus. Of the 271 IAV-positive samples, 236 cross-reacted with swine IAVs, 1 with avian IAVs, and 16 with avian and swine IAVs, indicating that feral swine had been exposed to both swine and avian IAVs but predominantly to swine IAVs. Our findings suggest that feral swine could potentially be infected with both avian and swine IAVs, generating novel IAVs by hosting and reassorting IAVs from wild birds and domestic swine and facilitating adaptation of avian IAVs to other hosts, including humans, before their spillover. Continued surveillance to monitor the distribution and antigenic diversities of IAVs in feral swine is necessary to increase our understanding of the natural history of IAVs.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, DomesticBirdsHumansInfluenza A virusInfluenza, HumanInfluenza in BirdsOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsPhylogenySwineUnited Statesavian virusesdomestic swineferal swineinfluenza A virusinfluenza surveillancemixing vesselseroprevalenceswine influenza virusUnited Stateswild birds

Identifiers

PMID28733290
PMCPMC5601342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.