ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2017
A confidence building exercise in data and identifiability: Modeling cancer chemotherapy as a case study.
Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- In silico clinical trials of BiTE expression by oncolytic viruses reveal the impact of patient heterogeneity on dosage protocol.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- A virtual cohort framework with applications to adoptive cell therapy in bladder cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- A review on in-silico analysis of immune cell trafficking and interactions with the tumour microenvironment.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Impacts of Antibody Structure and Mixtures on Receptor Signaling for Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity.The AAPS journal · 2025Article
- Advances in surrogate modeling for biological agent-based simulations: trends, challenges, and future prospects.Journal of mathematical biology · 2025Review
- Structural and practical identifiability of within-host models of virus dynamics - a review.Current opinion in systems biology · 2025Article
- Evaluating PSA dynamics for predicting androgen deprivation failure with a patient specific prostate cancer model.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
- Optimal control of combination immunotherapy for a virtual murine cohort in a glioblastoma-immune dynamics model.Journal of theoretical biology · 2024Article
- Practical parameter identifiability and handling of censored data with Bayesian inference in mathematical tumour models.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- Optimal control of combination immunotherapy for a virtual murine cohort in a glioblastoma-immune dynamics model.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Design of Crosslinking Antibodies For T-Cell Activation: Experimental and Computational Analysis of PD-1/CD137 Bispecific Agents.The AAPS journal · 2024Article
- Minimally sufficient experimental design using identifiability analysis.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- Connecting Agent-Based Models with High-Dimensional Parameter Spaces to Multidimensional Data Using SMoRe ParS: A Surrogate Modeling Approach.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2023Article
- Parameter estimation and identifiability analysis for a bivalent analyte model of monoclonal antibody-antigen binding.Analytical biochemistry · 2023Article
- Distilling identifiable and interpretable dynamic models from biological data.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- A comparative analysis of 2D and 3D experimental data for the identification of the parameters of computational models.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Benchmarking tools for a priori identifiability analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Practical Understanding of Cancer Model Identifiability in Clinical Applications.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A practical guide for the generation of model-based virtual clinical trials.Frontiers in systems biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mathematical modeling has a long history in the field of cancer therapeutics, and there is increasing recognition that it can help uncover the mechanisms that underlie tumor response to treatment. However, making quantitative predictions with such models often requires parameter estimation from data, raising questions of parameter identifiability and estimability. Even in the case of structural (theoretical) identifiability, imperfect data and the resulting practical unidentifiability of model parameters can make it difficult to infer the desired information, and in some cases, to yield biologically correct inferences and predictions. Here, we examine parameter identifiability and estimability using a case study of two compartmental, ordinary differential equation models of cancer treatment with drugs that are cell cycle-specific (taxol) as well as non-specific (oxaliplatin). We proceed through model building, structural identifiability analysis, parameter estimation, practical identifiability analysis and its biological implications, as well as alternative data collection protocols and experimental designs that render the model identifiable. We use the differential algebra/input-output relationship approach for structural identifiability, and primarily the profile likelihood approach for practical identifiability. Despite the models being structurally identifiable, we show that without consideration of practical identifiability, incorrect cell cycle distributions can be inferred, that would result in suboptimal therapeutic choices. We illustrate the usefulness of estimating practically identifiable combinations (in addition to the more typically considered structurally identifiable combinations) in generating biologically meaningful insights. We also use simulated data to evaluate how the practical identifiability of the model would change under alternative experimental designs. These results highlight the importance of understanding the underlying mechanisms rather than purely using parsimony or information criteria/goodness-of-fit to decide model selection questions. The overall roadmap for identifiability testing laid out here can be used to help provide mechanistic insight into complex biological phenomena, reduce experimental costs, and optimize model-driven experimentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.