Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28733128›Full record

ReviewJournal of pediatric nursing

Dance for Health: An Intergenerational Program to Increase Access to Physical Activity.

Krista Schroeder, Sarah J Ratcliffe, Adriana Perez, David Earley, Cory Bowman, Terri H Lipman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pediatric nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Determinants of caregiving grandparents' physical activity and sedentary behavior: a qualitative study using focus group discussions.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Knowledge in Motion: A Comprehensive Review of Evidence-Based Human Kinetics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Dance to Prosper: Benefits of Chinese Square Dance in QOL and the Moderating Roles of Aging Stereotypes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Intergenerational Taekwondo Program: A Narrative Review and Practical Intervention Proposal.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Krista SchroederUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, United States. Electronic address: krsch@upenn.edu.
Sarah J RatcliffeUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Adriana PerezUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
David EarleyIn the Dance, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Cory BowmanUniversity of Pennsylvania, Netter Center for Community Partnerships, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Terri H LipmanUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
University of Pennsylvania · USTioga County Partnership for Community Health · US

Funding

RESEARCH ON VULNERABLE WOMEN CHILDREN AND FAMILIEST32NR007100 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MEDOFF-COOPER, BARBARA S · 1998 to 2018
$7.2M
NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate Dance for Health, an intergenerational program to increase access to physical activity in an underserved, high risk urban community. DESIGN AND

methodsDance for Health was developed using community-based participatory research methods and evaluated using an observational study design. The program entailed two hour line dancing sessions delivered by trained dance instructors in the neighborhood recreation center. The weekly sessions were delivered for one month in the spring and one month in the fall from 2012-2016. Nurse practitioner students mentored local high school students to assess outcomes: achievement of target heart rate, Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion, number of pedometer steps during dance session, Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale, and adiposity. Analytic methods included descriptive statistics and mixed effects models.

resultsFrom 2012-2016, 521 participants ranging from 2-79 years attended Dance for Health. Approximately 50% of children and 80% of adults achieved target heart rate. Achievement of target heart rate was not related to perceived exertion, though it was related to pedometer steps in adults. All participants rated the program highly for enjoyment. There was no change in adiposity.

conclusionsDance for Health demonstrated high levels of community engagement and enjoyment. It led to adequate levels of exertion, particularly for adults. Our evaluation can inform program refinement and future intergenerational physical activity programs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Dance is an enjoyable, culturally appropriate, low cost method for increasing access to physical activity for children and families.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdolescentAdultAgedChildCommunity Health ServicesDancingExerciseFemaleHealth PromotionHumansIntergenerational RelationsMaleMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationSocioeconomic FactorsCommunity based participatory researchCommunity engagementDanceExerciseIntergenerationalPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID28733128
PMCPMC5681394
OpenAlexW2737144865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.