ArticleBMC genomics2017
Common and phylogenetically widespread coding for peptides by bacterial small RNAs.
Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Overview of small proteins encoded by bacterial dual-function small RNAs.Non-coding RNA research · 2025Review
- Review
- Article
- Integrated sequence and -omic features reveal novel small proteome ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- High-Resolution Small RNAs Landscape Provides Insights into Alkane Adaptation in the Marine Alkane-Degrader Alcanivorax dieselolei B-5International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- Hundreds of Out-of-Frame Remodeled Gene Families in the Escherichia coli Pangenome.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Hidden in plain sight: challenges in proteomics detection of small ORF-encoded polypeptides.microLife · 2022Article
- Understanding small ORF diversity through a comprehensive transcription feature classification.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2021Review
- Automated Prediction and Annotation of Small Open Reading Frames in Microbial Genomes.Cell host & microbe · 2021Article
- cncRNAdb: a manually curated resource of experimentally supported RNAs with both protein-coding and noncoding function.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Lost and Found: Re-searching and Re-scoring Proteomics Data Aids Genome Annotation and Improves Proteome Coverage.mSystems · 2020Article
- Structured RNA Contaminants in Bacterial Ribo-Seq.mSphere · 2020Article
- The Transcriptomic Landscape ofGenes · 2020Article
- Are Antisense Proteins in Prokaryotes Functional?Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020Article
- Article
- Unraveling the hidden universe of small proteins in bacterial genomes.Molecular systems biology · 2019Article
- Characterization of Three Small Proteins in Brucella abortus Linked to Fucose Utilization.Journal of bacteriology · 2018Article
- Dual-Function RNAs.Microbiology spectrum · 2018Review
- The Novel Anaerobiosis-Responsive Overlapping GeneFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile eukaryotic noncoding RNAs have recently received intense scrutiny, it is becoming clear that bacterial transcription is at least as pervasive. Bacterial small RNAs and antisense RNAs (sRNAs) are often assumed to be noncoding, due to their lack of long open reading frames (ORFs). However, there are numerous examples of sRNAs encoding for small proteins, whether or not they also have a regulatory role at the RNA level.
methodsHere, we apply flexible machine learning techniques based on sequence features and comparative genomics to quantify the prevalence of sRNA ORFs under natural selection to maintain protein-coding function in 14 phylogenetically diverse bacteria. Importantly, we quantify uncertainty in our predictions, and follow up on them using mass spectrometry proteomics and comparison to datasets including ribosome profiling.
resultsA majority of annotated sRNAs have at least one ORF between 10 and 50 amino acids long, and we conservatively predict that 409±191.7 unannotated sRNA ORFs are under selection to maintain coding (mean estimate and 95% confidence interval), an average of 29 per species considered here. This implies that overall at least 10.3±0.5% of sRNAs have a coding ORF, and in some species around 20% do. 165±69 of these novel coding ORFs have some antisense overlap to annotated ORFs. As experimental validation, many of our predictions are translated in published ribosome profiling data and are identified via mass spectrometry shotgun proteomics. B. subtilis sRNAs with coding ORFs are enriched for high expression in biofilms and confluent growth, and S. pneumoniae sRNAs with coding ORFs are involved in virulence. sRNA coding ORFs are enriched for transmembrane domains and many are predicted novel components of type I toxin/antitoxin systems.
conclusionsWe predict over two dozen new protein-coding genes per bacterial species, but crucially also quantified the uncertainty in this estimate. Our predictions for sRNA coding ORFs, along with predicted novel type I toxins and tools for sorting and visualizing genomic context, are freely available in a user-friendly format at http://disco-bac.web.pasteur.fr. We expect these easily-accessible predictions to be a valuable tool for the study not only of bacterial sRNAs and type I toxin-antitoxin systems, but also of bacterial genetics and genomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.